Ultra-dense lutetium oxide ceramic scintillators for positron emission tomography

<i>Objective.</i>Lutetium oxide (Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), with its high density (9.4 g cm<sup>-3</sup>), presents a compelling scintillation host for detecting 511 keV annihilation photons in positron emission tomography (PET). Despite its favorable density, the practical deployment of Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based scintillators for PET has faced limitations due to difficulties in crystal growth and inappropriate decay time. Recent progress in ceramic processing has facilitated the development of transparent Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>ceramics, while targeted doping strategies have significantly improved their luminescence performance. This study evaluates the performance of Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb and a newly developed ceramic scintillator of (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La, a modified Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based compound incorporating yttrium (Y) and doped with lanthanum (La).<i>Approach.</i>Various ceramic disks were fabricated and cut into 3 × 3 × 5 mm<sup>3</sup>samples. The performance of both Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb and (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic samples in terms of decay time, energy resolution, and coincidence timing resolution (CTR) was assessed. Decay time measurements were conducted using waveform data collected from samples mounted on an H10580 photomultiplier tube (PMT) and irradiated with 511 keV photons from a<sup>22</sup>Na source. Energy and CTRs were evaluated using both PMT and silicon photomultiplier setups, arranged in coincidence with a reference lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) detector of the same size.<i>Main results.</i>All three (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic scintillator samples exhibited a triple exponential decay profile and were dominated by a slow component ranging from 1379.3 to 1515.6 ns. The best energy resolution of 15.4% at 511 keV and the best CTR of 237.9 ps full width at half maximum (FWHM) were observed for the same sample. In contrast, a fast decay time of 1.6 ns was observed for the Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb samples, which exhibited CTR values ranging from 237.9 ps to 261.4 ps FWHM, while the photopeak at 511 keV was difficult to distinguish. These CTR values were estimated between two identical ceramic samples, derived from coincidence measurements of each ceramic sample against the LYSO reference detector. The (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La samples achieved CTR values comparable to those of the Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb samples, as their much higher light yield offsets the disadvantage associated with their slower decay time.<i>Significance.</i>These results highlight the promising potential of the (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic scintillators for PET applications, especially for time-of-flight PET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae456f
Primary Topic
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultra-dense lutetium oxide ceramic scintillators for positron emission tomography

Ryosuke Ota, Hamidreza Hemati, Akram Hamato, Sun Il Kwon et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
article

Ultra-dense lutetium oxide ceramic scintillators for positron emission tomography

Ryosuke Ota, Hamidreza Hemati, Akram Hamato, Sun Il Kwon, Simon R Cherry, Jarek Glodo, Taiga Yamaya, Suyoung Kim, Lakshmi Soundara Pandian, Yimin Wang, Matthias A. Müller, Daehee Lee
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Lutetium oxide (Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), with its high density (9.4 g cm<sup>-3</sup>), presents a compelling scintillation host for detecting 511 keV annihilation photons in positron emission tomography (PET). Despite its favorable density, the practical deployment of Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based scintillators for PET has faced limitations due to difficulties in crystal growth and inappropriate decay time. Recent progress in ceramic processing has facilitated the development of transparent Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>ceramics, while targeted doping strategies have significantly improved their luminescence performance. This study evaluates the performance of Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb and a newly developed ceramic scintillator of (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La, a modified Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based compound incorporating yttrium (Y) and doped with lanthanum (La).<i>Approach.</i>Various ceramic disks were fabricated and cut into 3 × 3 × 5 mm<sup>3</sup>samples. The performance of both Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb and (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic samples in terms of decay time, energy resolution, and coincidence timing resolution (CTR) was assessed. Decay time measurements were conducted using waveform data collected from samples mounted on an H10580 photomultiplier tube (PMT) and irradiated with 511 keV photons from a<sup>22</sup>Na source. Energy and CTRs were evaluated using both PMT and silicon photomultiplier setups, arranged in coincidence with a reference lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) detector of the same size.<i>Main results.</i>All three (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic scintillator samples exhibited a triple exponential decay profile and were dominated by a slow component ranging from 1379.3 to 1515.6 ns. The best energy resolution of 15.4% at 511 keV and the best CTR of 237.9 ps full width at half maximum (FWHM) were observed for the same sample. In contrast, a fast decay time of 1.6 ns was observed for the Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb samples, which exhibited CTR values ranging from 237.9 ps to 261.4 ps FWHM, while the photopeak at 511 keV was difficult to distinguish. These CTR values were estimated between two identical ceramic samples, derived from coincidence measurements of each ceramic sample against the LYSO reference detector. The (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La samples achieved CTR values comparable to those of the Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:Yb samples, as their much higher light yield offsets the disadvantage associated with their slower decay time.<i>Significance.</i>These results highlight the promising potential of the (Lu,Y)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:La ceramic scintillators for PET applications, especially for time-of-flight PET.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(4)
Hamamatsu Photonics (Japan) (JP), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP), Radiation Monitoring Devices (United States) (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.