Genomic approaches to accelerate American chestnut restoration

More than a century after two introduced pathogens killed billions of American chestnut trees, introgression of resistance alleles from Chinese chestnuts has contributed to the recovery of self-sustaining populations. However, progress has been slow because of the complex genetic architecture of resistance. To better understand blight resistance, we compared reference genomes, gene expression responses, and stem metabolite profiles of the resistant Chinese and susceptible American chestnut species. To accelerate resistance breeding, we conducted large-scale phenotyping and genotyping in hybrids of these species. Simulation and inoculation experiments suggest that significant resistance gains are possible through selectively breeding trees with an average of 70 to 85% American chestnut ancestry. The resources developed in this work are foundational for breeding to create diverse restoration populations with sufficient disease resistance and competitive growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adw3225
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic approaches to accelerate American chestnut restoration

Erik Carlson, Paul H. Sisco, Tomás A. Rush, Sara F. Fitzsimmons et al.
1 citations
Science
Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
44.88
article

Genomic approaches to accelerate American chestnut restoration

Erik Carlson, Paul H. Sisco, Tomás A. Rush, Sara F. Fitzsimmons, Martin L. Cipollini, Joseph B. James, John T. Lovell, Avinash Sreedasyam, John E. Carlson, Madhavi Z. Martin, Thomas M. Saielli, Melissa Williams, Austin Thomas, Cassie Stark, Kathleen McKeever, William A. Powell, Bruce L. Levine, Thomas James Ellis, David Goodstein, Jerry Jenkins, Nancy L. Engle, Florian Carle, Shenghua Fan, Susanna Keriö, Alexander M. Sandercock, Lake E. Graboski, Andrew E. Newhouse, Joanna Malukiewicz, Eric V. Jenkins, Steven N. Jeffers, John A. Scrivani, Christopher Plott, Jared W. Westbrook, B. K. Clark, Tetyana Zhebentyayeva, Joanna Tannous, Kendra Collins, Eric J. Evans, Jarrett BJ, Frederick V. Hebard, Zamin K. Yang, James McKenna, LoriBeth Boston, Stephen Hoy, Lucinda Wigfield, Lauren M. Kerwien, Ciera Wilbur, Jack Swatt, Jack Ostroff, Caragh Heverly, Vasiliy Lakoba, Jamie Van Clief, Caleb Kell, Xiaoxia Xia, Jason Holliday, Jane Grimwood, Timothy J. Tschaplinski, Qian Zhang, Jack Orebaugh, C. Dana Nelson, Albert G. Abbott, Erica Smith, Jeremy Schmutz, J. Hill Craddock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

More than a century after two introduced pathogens killed billions of American chestnut trees, introgression of resistance alleles from Chinese chestnuts has contributed to the recovery of self-sustaining populations. However, progress has been slow because of the complex genetic architecture of resistance. To better understand blight resistance, we compared reference genomes, gene expression responses, and stem metabolite profiles of the resistant Chinese and susceptible American chestnut species. To accelerate resistance breeding, we conducted large-scale phenotyping and genotyping in hybrids of these species. Simulation and inoculation experiments suggest that significant resistance gains are possible through selectively breeding trees with an average of 70 to 85% American chestnut ancestry. The resources developed in this work are foundational for breeding to create diverse restoration populations with sufficient disease resistance and competitive growth.

ScienceVol. 391(6786)
Berry College (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), The American Chestnut Foundation (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), State University of New York (US), Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology (AT), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US), Joint Genome Institute (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (US), Yale University (US), York University (US), Southern Research Station (US), Timber Institute (CZ), HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology (US), Bioenergy Life Science (United States) (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Clemson University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
44.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.