Duration between rewards controls the rate of behavioral and dopaminergic learning

Learning the causes of rewards is crucial for survival. Cue-reward associative learning is controlled in the brain by mesolimbic dopamine. It is widely believed that dopamine drives learning by conveying a reward prediction error. Dopamine-based learning algorithms are generally 'trial-based': learning progresses sequentially across individual cue-outcome experiences. A foundational assumption of these models is that the more cue-reward pairings one experiences over a fixed duration, the more one learns this association. By identifying a new biological principle governing learning, we disprove this assumption. Specifically, across many conditions in mice, we show that behavioral and dopaminergic learning rates are proportional to the duration between rewards (or punishments). Due to this rule, the overall learning over a fixed duration is independent of the number of cue-outcome experiences. A dopamine-based model of retrospective learning explains these findings, thereby providing a unified account of the biological mechanisms of learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-026-02206-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Duration between rewards controls the rate of behavioral and dopaminergic learning

Leo Zsembik, Annie Taylor, Brenda Wu, Joseph R Floeder et al.
1 citations
Nature Neuroscience
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
23.21
article

Duration between rewards controls the rate of behavioral and dopaminergic learning

Leo Zsembik, Annie Taylor, Brenda Wu, Joseph R Floeder, Dennis A. Burke, Ritchie Chen, Huijeong Jeong, SeulAh Lee, Gautam A. Naik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Learning the causes of rewards is crucial for survival. Cue-reward associative learning is controlled in the brain by mesolimbic dopamine. It is widely believed that dopamine drives learning by conveying a reward prediction error. Dopamine-based learning algorithms are generally 'trial-based': learning progresses sequentially across individual cue-outcome experiences. A foundational assumption of these models is that the more cue-reward pairings one experiences over a fixed duration, the more one learns this association. By identifying a new biological principle governing learning, we disprove this assumption. Specifically, across many conditions in mice, we show that behavioral and dopaminergic learning rates are proportional to the duration between rewards (or punishments). Due to this rule, the overall learning over a fixed duration is independent of the number of cue-outcome experiences. A dopamine-based model of retrospective learning explains these findings, thereby providing a unified account of the biological mechanisms of learning.

Nature Neuroscience
University of California, San Francisco (US), Center for Neurosciences (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, University of California, San Francisco
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
23.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.