Human Factors Influencing Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Literature Review

Occupational ApplicationsThe adoption of AI in healthcare depends on calibrated trust-trust that matches the system's reliability and context. This review shows that clinicians value workload reduction, explainability, and alignment with clinical judgment, while patients emphasize transparency, fairness, and human-like interaction. Yet, trust is not automatic: performance gains may fail if AI undermines professional autonomy, and explainability reassures novices more than experts in high-stakes tasks. For occupational applications, AI must be designed to reduce cognitive burden, respect user expertise, and adapt to domain-specific needs. Organizations should invest in usability testing, peer and organizational support, and targeted training to foster informed trust. Regulators should enforce transparency and human oversight standards. Ultimately, calibrated trust, avoiding blind reliance or excessive skepticism, is essential to protect healthcare workers and patients while ensuring AI strengthens decision-making and safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2026.2625655
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Factors Influencing Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Literature Review

Hamid Shamszare, Avishek Choudhury
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Human Factors Influencing Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Literature Review

Hamid Shamszare, Avishek Choudhury
article en

Abstract

Occupational ApplicationsThe adoption of AI in healthcare depends on calibrated trust-trust that matches the system's reliability and context. This review shows that clinicians value workload reduction, explainability, and alignment with clinical judgment, while patients emphasize transparency, fairness, and human-like interaction. Yet, trust is not automatic: performance gains may fail if AI undermines professional autonomy, and explainability reassures novices more than experts in high-stakes tasks. For occupational applications, AI must be designed to reduce cognitive burden, respect user expertise, and adapt to domain-specific needs. Organizations should invest in usability testing, peer and organizational support, and targeted training to foster informed trust. Regulators should enforce transparency and human oversight standards. Ultimately, calibrated trust, avoiding blind reliance or excessive skepticism, is essential to protect healthcare workers and patients while ensuring AI strengthens decision-making and safety.

IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
West Virginia University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.