Psychological induction of interoceptive states

Physiological changes to the body can give rise to interoceptive states, which are characterised by a particular feel, a bodily location, and motivational salience, with these features often evolving over time. The experimental study of interoception often involves generating a physiological change to produce the interoceptive state. This has conceptual and empirical limitations. Conceptually, isolating the role of psychological processes is difficult when the interoceptive state is always preceded by a physiological change. Empirically, generating a physiological change may be impractical in certain circumstances (e.g., in a scanner) or difficult to enact for other reasons (e.g., participant safety). In this review, one solution to these types of problem is examined, which has parallels to the use of illusions to study perceptual processing in vision and audition. Here, examples of psychological induction of interoceptive states occurring without the normal physiological change are reviewed, in addition to inductions that modify the perception of physiological change or the change itself. Across ten interoceptive bodily axes, evidence for psychological induction was found in four (gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, integument), evidence for modification in two (genitourinary, musculoskeletal), evidence was suggestive in three (osmotic, immune, drug-related); and unclear in one (thermal). The commonest induction method was false feedback, but several other approaches were employed (e.g., passive observing). Most psychological inductions were motivationally salient even with no physiological perturbation to the body. Associative learning was the commonest explanation for these effects. The empirical, theoretical, and practical implications of psychological interoceptive inductions, are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2026.104015
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological induction of interoceptive states

Richard J. Stevenson
Consciousness and Cognition
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Psychological induction of interoceptive states

Richard J. Stevenson
article en

Abstract

Physiological changes to the body can give rise to interoceptive states, which are characterised by a particular feel, a bodily location, and motivational salience, with these features often evolving over time. The experimental study of interoception often involves generating a physiological change to produce the interoceptive state. This has conceptual and empirical limitations. Conceptually, isolating the role of psychological processes is difficult when the interoceptive state is always preceded by a physiological change. Empirically, generating a physiological change may be impractical in certain circumstances (e.g., in a scanner) or difficult to enact for other reasons (e.g., participant safety). In this review, one solution to these types of problem is examined, which has parallels to the use of illusions to study perceptual processing in vision and audition. Here, examples of psychological induction of interoceptive states occurring without the normal physiological change are reviewed, in addition to inductions that modify the perception of physiological change or the change itself. Across ten interoceptive bodily axes, evidence for psychological induction was found in four (gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, integument), evidence for modification in two (genitourinary, musculoskeletal), evidence was suggestive in three (osmotic, immune, drug-related); and unclear in one (thermal). The commonest induction method was false feedback, but several other approaches were employed (e.g., passive observing). Most psychological inductions were motivationally salient even with no physiological perturbation to the body. Associative learning was the commonest explanation for these effects. The empirical, theoretical, and practical implications of psychological interoceptive inductions, are discussed.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 139
Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.