Prognostic utility of the <scp>MECKI</scp> score in a mixed United States cohort

The Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score has demonstrated prognostic utility in European and Asian cohorts with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to evaluate its performance in an American cohort. We retrospectively identified patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) at our institution in 2022-2024 with data to calculate the MECKI and CPX Risk scores. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, heart failure admission, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device. Survival analysis was assessed via Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test, with ROC curves for comparison. Overall, 803 patients met criteria, with 451 (56%) female, 228 (28%) Black race, and median body mass index 29.4 (25.0-34.2) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Pre-existing HFrEF was present in 187 (23%) patients. 719 (90%), 41 (5%), and 43 (5%) patients achieved MECKI scores <10%, 10%-20%, and ≥20%, respectively, with stepwise increases in 2-year risk of primary endpoints (log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 196.0, p < 0.001). ROC curves demonstrated better performance of MECKI scores compared to CPX Risk scores. Events were similarly predicted in patients with HFrEF, with similar performances between the two scores. In conclusion, in a mixed American cohort the MECKI score demonstrated robust performance in predicting event-free survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70770
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic utility of the MECKI score in a mixed United States cohort

R Arena, Hamang M Patel, Cory R. Trankle, Matthew G. Kaye et al.
Physiological Reports
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Prognostic utility of the MECKI score in a mixed United States cohort

R Arena, Hamang M Patel, Cory R. Trankle, Matthew G. Kaye, Bailey Parsons, Adarsh Mallepally, Justin Canada, Shreya Krishnamurthy, Teymur Zavar, Kaivalya Dandamudi
article en

Abstract

The Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score has demonstrated prognostic utility in European and Asian cohorts with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to evaluate its performance in an American cohort. We retrospectively identified patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) at our institution in 2022-2024 with data to calculate the MECKI and CPX Risk scores. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, heart failure admission, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device. Survival analysis was assessed via Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test, with ROC curves for comparison. Overall, 803 patients met criteria, with 451 (56%) female, 228 (28%) Black race, and median body mass index 29.4 (25.0-34.2) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Pre-existing HFrEF was present in 187 (23%) patients. 719 (90%), 41 (5%), and 43 (5%) patients achieved MECKI scores <10%, 10%-20%, and ≥20%, respectively, with stepwise increases in 2-year risk of primary endpoints (log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 196.0, p < 0.001). ROC curves demonstrated better performance of MECKI scores compared to CPX Risk scores. Events were similarly predicted in patients with HFrEF, with similar performances between the two scores. In conclusion, in a mixed American cohort the MECKI score demonstrated robust performance in predicting event-free survival.

Physiological ReportsVol. 14(3)
William & Mary (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Williams (United States) (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.