Objective Quality Assessment for Precision Functional MRI Data

Precision functional mapping (PFM) enables individual-level characterization of brain network organization but requires substantially more and higher-quality fMRI data than is standard. Despite its growing use, objective criteria for data sufficiency and quality needed to ensure interpretable and replicable individual-level results remain unclear. Here, we introduce the Network Similarity Index (NSI), an objective measure of the extent to which functional connectivity (FC) patterns in an individual dataset express the large-scale network structure required for PFM. NSI captures the integrity of low-spatial-frequency, coherent network organization and denoising fidelity, and aligns closely with blinded expert assessments of PFM usability. NSI also accounts for variability in the rate at which FC becomes reliable across individuals. Here, we provide an open-source framework for NSI-based data quality evaluation and models for linking NSI values with expert-judged PFM suitability. This framework can also inform expected returns from additional data collection, enabling principled decisions about data sufficiency and replication in precision fMRI research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.10.704857
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective Quality Assessment for Precision Functional MRI Data

Jacqueline A. Clauss, Zach Ladwig, Charles J. Lynch, Lindsay W. Victoria et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Objective Quality Assessment for Precision Functional MRI Data

Jacqueline A. Clauss, Zach Ladwig, Charles J. Lynch, Lindsay W. Victoria, Megan Chang, Derrick Matthew Buchanan, Benjamin Zebley, Faith M. Gunning, Diana C. Perez, Jingnan Du, Parsa Nilchian, Immanuel Elbau, Jonathan H. Downar, Logan Grosenick, Jonathan D. Power, Eric L. Goldwaser, Nolan Williams, Stefano Moia, Timothy O. Laumann, Nili Solomonov, Elizabeth Gregory, Jolene Chou, Indira Summerville, M Tina Johnson, Claire Ho, Nicola Manfredi, Conor Liston, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Mahendra T. Bhati, Tommy Ng, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Daniel M. Blumberger, Cesar Caballero-Gaudes, Evan M. Gordon, Maximilian Lueckel
article en

Abstract

Precision functional mapping (PFM) enables individual-level characterization of brain network organization but requires substantially more and higher-quality fMRI data than is standard. Despite its growing use, objective criteria for data sufficiency and quality needed to ensure interpretable and replicable individual-level results remain unclear. Here, we introduce the Network Similarity Index (NSI), an objective measure of the extent to which functional connectivity (FC) patterns in an individual dataset express the large-scale network structure required for PFM. NSI captures the integrity of low-spatial-frequency, coherent network organization and denoising fidelity, and aligns closely with blinded expert assessments of PFM usability. NSI also accounts for variability in the rate at which FC becomes reliable across individuals. Here, we provide an open-source framework for NSI-based data quality evaluation and models for linking NSI values with expert-judged PFM suitability. This framework can also inform expected returns from additional data collection, enabling principled decisions about data sufficiency and replication in precision fMRI research.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (DE), Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab (FR), Center for Pain and the Brain (US), Resonance Research (United States) (US), Psychiatric Medical Center (AM), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.