A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Neuropeptide Identification

Neuropeptides play many roles. While mainly present in glial cells, they act as neurotransmitter peptides in the endocrine system and as hormonal peptides in the immune system. Recent peptide research has been ground-breaking, but neither cost nor time-efficient. In this study, machine learning techniques were applied to explore whether peptide sequence information was sufficient to identify neuropeptides from non-neuropeptides. Receiving a dataset consisting of 4,870 peptide sequences, divided equally into each positive and negative class, was analyzed using amino acid composition, peptide length, and k-mer bag-of-words. The research and workflow were created on the Orange3 data mining platform, which allowed time-efficient evaluation. The learning models applied in this study were logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting, and all were trained with the data to reveal their accuracy in identifying neuropeptides. Model performance was calculated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The results showed that models utilizing a combination of features achieved strong predictive performance, with the best accuracy received from gradient boosting and random forests. These findings indicate that amino acid sequence information combined with the k-mer bag-of-words approach provided sufficient results to assume the machine learning (ML) models gradient boosting and random forest can accurately distinguish neuropeptides from non-neuropeptides. This study demonstrates the value of using ML for peptide research and showcases the potential of accelerating neuropeptide discovery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/mars/15264
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Neuropeptide Identification

Jasmine Arora
Open MIND
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
article

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Neuropeptide Identification

Jasmine Arora
article en

Abstract

Neuropeptides play many roles. While mainly present in glial cells, they act as neurotransmitter peptides in the endocrine system and as hormonal peptides in the immune system. Recent peptide research has been ground-breaking, but neither cost nor time-efficient. In this study, machine learning techniques were applied to explore whether peptide sequence information was sufficient to identify neuropeptides from non-neuropeptides. Receiving a dataset consisting of 4,870 peptide sequences, divided equally into each positive and negative class, was analyzed using amino acid composition, peptide length, and k-mer bag-of-words. The research and workflow were created on the Orange3 data mining platform, which allowed time-efficient evaluation. The learning models applied in this study were logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting, and all were trained with the data to reveal their accuracy in identifying neuropeptides. Model performance was calculated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The results showed that models utilizing a combination of features achieved strong predictive performance, with the best accuracy received from gradient boosting and random forests. These findings indicate that amino acid sequence information combined with the k-mer bag-of-words approach provided sufficient results to assume the machine learning (ML) models gradient boosting and random forest can accurately distinguish neuropeptides from non-neuropeptides. This study demonstrates the value of using ML for peptide research and showcases the potential of accelerating neuropeptide discovery.

Open MIND
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.