Understanding Intentions to Disclose Suicidal Thoughts and Intent

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> Nondisclosure of suicidal thoughts is common and impedes suicide prevention. Consistent predictors of suicide disclosure have not been identified, and it is unclear how depression impacts various aspects of disclosure. Disclosure occurs within relationships, but few studies have used social network measures to understand structure, quality, and functional factors influencing disclosure. <i>Aims:</i> This study aimed to understand whether social network characteristics predict likelihood to disclose suicidal thoughts and intent. <i>Methods: N</i> = 87 adults experiencing suicidal ideation and/or depressive, anxious, or psychotic symptoms completed an egocentric social network measure assessing relationship features, likelihood to disclose suicidal thoughts and intent, and perceived benefits and risks of disclosure for each network member. Participants also completed a general suicide help-seeking scale. Generalized estimating equations with participant-level clustering evaluated associations between disclosure likelihood (thoughts and intent) and structural, functional, and quality social characteristics, as well as perceived benefits (e.g., emotional support) and risks (e.g., embarrassment) of disclosure. Spearman's correlations assessed associations between disclosure likelihood and depression symptoms, as well as general help-seeking. <i>Results:</i> On average, networks had 4.7 people (<i>SD</i> = 1.7). Higher closeness and emotional support, but not network size, predicted greater likelihoods of disclosing suicidal thoughts and intent. Depression severity was negatively correlated with disclosure likelihood, and the association between emotional support and disclosure likelihood was attenuated at higher depression levels. Perceived benefits, but not risks, were correlates of disclosure intentions. <i>Limitations:</i> Analyses were cross-sectional; it is unknown how social network changes would influence future disclosure. Most of the participants were not experiencing active suicidal ideation, which limits generalizability to more acutely distressed populations. <i>Conclusions:</i> Social network measurement facilitates understanding of suicide disclosure, and quality and functional aspects of relationships may be more impactful than structural aspects. Depression severity may attenuate the positive influence of emotional support on disclosure. Increasing perceived benefits of disclosure could be a novel suicide prevention strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001053
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Intentions to Disclose Suicidal Thoughts and Intent

Anthony Fulginiti, Michael L. Thomas, Charles T. Taylor, Lauren E. McBride et al.
Crisis
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Understanding Intentions to Disclose Suicidal Thoughts and Intent

Anthony Fulginiti, Michael L. Thomas, Charles T. Taylor, Lauren E. McBride, Colin A. Depp, H K Baker, Ellen E. Lee, Eric Granholm
article en

Abstract

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> Nondisclosure of suicidal thoughts is common and impedes suicide prevention. Consistent predictors of suicide disclosure have not been identified, and it is unclear how depression impacts various aspects of disclosure. Disclosure occurs within relationships, but few studies have used social network measures to understand structure, quality, and functional factors influencing disclosure. <i>Aims:</i> This study aimed to understand whether social network characteristics predict likelihood to disclose suicidal thoughts and intent. <i>Methods: N</i> = 87 adults experiencing suicidal ideation and/or depressive, anxious, or psychotic symptoms completed an egocentric social network measure assessing relationship features, likelihood to disclose suicidal thoughts and intent, and perceived benefits and risks of disclosure for each network member. Participants also completed a general suicide help-seeking scale. Generalized estimating equations with participant-level clustering evaluated associations between disclosure likelihood (thoughts and intent) and structural, functional, and quality social characteristics, as well as perceived benefits (e.g., emotional support) and risks (e.g., embarrassment) of disclosure. Spearman's correlations assessed associations between disclosure likelihood and depression symptoms, as well as general help-seeking. <i>Results:</i> On average, networks had 4.7 people (<i>SD</i> = 1.7). Higher closeness and emotional support, but not network size, predicted greater likelihoods of disclosing suicidal thoughts and intent. Depression severity was negatively correlated with disclosure likelihood, and the association between emotional support and disclosure likelihood was attenuated at higher depression levels. Perceived benefits, but not risks, were correlates of disclosure intentions. <i>Limitations:</i> Analyses were cross-sectional; it is unknown how social network changes would influence future disclosure. Most of the participants were not experiencing active suicidal ideation, which limits generalizability to more acutely distressed populations. <i>Conclusions:</i> Social network measurement facilitates understanding of suicide disclosure, and quality and functional aspects of relationships may be more impactful than structural aspects. Depression severity may attenuate the positive influence of emotional support on disclosure. Increasing perceived benefits of disclosure could be a novel suicide prevention strategy.

CrisisVol. 47(2)
University of Denver (US), San Diego State University (US), University of California San Diego (US), VA San Diego Healthcare System (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), Institute on Aging (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.