The Moist Static Energy Budget of Australian Summer Monsoon Bursts in Climate Models: Insights From Present and Warming Climate Scenarios

Abstract This study investigates the complex dynamics of burst evolution in the Australian summer monsoon under present‐day and warmer climate conditions. Using reanalysis data, historical atmosphere‐only simulations (AMIP), and simulations with uniformly increased sea surface temperatures (+4K; AMIP+4K), we examine how seasonal‐mean precipitation and burst behavior respond to warming across eight climate models. A consistent link emerges between higher seasonal‐mean precipitation and a greater number of bursts. A moist static energy budget analysis reveals that horizontal moisture advection governs burst evolution, while model‐specific parameterizations add variability in burst characteristics. Some models show gradual transitions governed by horizontal moisture advection, others display abrupt shifts absent in reanalysis. Among the three models with AMIP+4K simulations, MRI‐ESM2‐0 and BCC‐CSM2‐MR reproduce seasonal precipitation patterns close to their AMIP counterparts, with burst frequencies nearly unchanged in BCC‐CSM2‐MR and slightly reduced in MRI‐ESM2‐0. Only MRI‐ESM2‐0 captures a gradual, physically consistent burst evolution resembling reanalysis, whereas BCC‐CSM2‐MR still shows abrupt transitions. IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, the third model with AMIP+4K simulations, shows a gradual evolution but produces stronger mean precipitation and fewer bursts—contrary to the typical positive precipitation–burst relationship. Cluster‐based composites show that precipitation changes arise from differing contributions of thermodynamic and dynamic components of vertical moisture advection. In MRI‐ESM2‐0, enhanced precipitation in warming scenarios is mainly driven by stronger thermodynamic moistening, whereas in IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, dynamically induced drying offsets thermodynamic gains, particularly in specific burst clusters. These results emphasize model‐dependent monsoon burst responses and the need to separate dynamic and thermodynamic influences to strengthen confidence in future hydro‐climate projections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd044471
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moist Static Energy Budget of Australian Summer Monsoon Bursts in Climate Models: Insights From Present and Warming Climate Scenarios

Sarthak Mohanty, Martin S. Singh
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
article

The Moist Static Energy Budget of Australian Summer Monsoon Bursts in Climate Models: Insights From Present and Warming Climate Scenarios

Sarthak Mohanty, Martin S. Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the complex dynamics of burst evolution in the Australian summer monsoon under present‐day and warmer climate conditions. Using reanalysis data, historical atmosphere‐only simulations (AMIP), and simulations with uniformly increased sea surface temperatures (+4K; AMIP+4K), we examine how seasonal‐mean precipitation and burst behavior respond to warming across eight climate models. A consistent link emerges between higher seasonal‐mean precipitation and a greater number of bursts. A moist static energy budget analysis reveals that horizontal moisture advection governs burst evolution, while model‐specific parameterizations add variability in burst characteristics. Some models show gradual transitions governed by horizontal moisture advection, others display abrupt shifts absent in reanalysis. Among the three models with AMIP+4K simulations, MRI‐ESM2‐0 and BCC‐CSM2‐MR reproduce seasonal precipitation patterns close to their AMIP counterparts, with burst frequencies nearly unchanged in BCC‐CSM2‐MR and slightly reduced in MRI‐ESM2‐0. Only MRI‐ESM2‐0 captures a gradual, physically consistent burst evolution resembling reanalysis, whereas BCC‐CSM2‐MR still shows abrupt transitions. IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, the third model with AMIP+4K simulations, shows a gradual evolution but produces stronger mean precipitation and fewer bursts—contrary to the typical positive precipitation–burst relationship. Cluster‐based composites show that precipitation changes arise from differing contributions of thermodynamic and dynamic components of vertical moisture advection. In MRI‐ESM2‐0, enhanced precipitation in warming scenarios is mainly driven by stronger thermodynamic moistening, whereas in IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, dynamically induced drying offsets thermodynamic gains, particularly in specific burst clusters. These results emphasize model‐dependent monsoon burst responses and the need to separate dynamic and thermodynamic influences to strengthen confidence in future hydro‐climate projections.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(4)
Institute for Basic Science (KR), Pusan National University (KR), Monash University (AU)
Climate Extremes
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.