The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication

In this study, normatively responsible advocacy is proposed as a primary objective of instructional risk and crisis communication during health-related crises and high-risk events. The World Health Organization's learning interventions provided to communities and countries during the COVID-19 pandemic serve as a case study. The case study emphasized phronesis in assessing the capacity for normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication to promote social justice. The case study revealed the recommendations provided in the World Health Organization's, <i>WHO implementation guidance on emergencies capacity-building: Approaches for just-in-time learning response to health emergencies</i>, are fitting with the four tenets of normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication: (1) balancing cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning; (2) improvisation in designing instructional content; (3) agility in distribution of instructional content; and (4) meeting the normative needs and expectations of diverse audiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2581731
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication

Timothy L. Sellnow, Amy Maciel
Health Communication
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication

Timothy L. Sellnow, Amy Maciel
article en

Abstract

In this study, normatively responsible advocacy is proposed as a primary objective of instructional risk and crisis communication during health-related crises and high-risk events. The World Health Organization's learning interventions provided to communities and countries during the COVID-19 pandemic serve as a case study. The case study emphasized phronesis in assessing the capacity for normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication to promote social justice. The case study revealed the recommendations provided in the World Health Organization's, <i>WHO implementation guidance on emergencies capacity-building: Approaches for just-in-time learning response to health emergencies</i>, are fitting with the four tenets of normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication: (1) balancing cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning; (2) improvisation in designing instructional content; (3) agility in distribution of instructional content; and (4) meeting the normative needs and expectations of diverse audiences.

Health CommunicationVol. 41(3)
Clemson University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.