Effect of 32% Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching on Surface Properties and Staining Susceptibility of CAD/CAM Hybrid and Feldspathic Ceramics Under Simultaneous Thermocycling–Staining Challenge

Resistance to post-bleaching staining and preservation of surface properties are critical to long-term durability of restorations. This study evaluated the effect of 32% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) in-office bleaching gel on surface roughness (Ra), microhardness, and staining susceptibility of three hybrid computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials compared with a feldspathic ceramic, subjected to a combined thermocycling-staining protocol.Slice specimens (<i>n</i> = 14/material) were prepared from hybrid ceramic materials: Vita Enamic (VE); Lava Ultimate (LU); Shofu Block HC (SB); and from a feldspathic ceramic material, VitaBlocs Mark II (VB), which served as the control. Seven slices per material underwent CIEDE2000 color difference analysis (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) after simultaneous staining and thermocycling (1,000 cycles, 5-55°C), with or without a prior bleaching procedure using 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> gel for three 15-minute cycles. The remaining slices were evaluated for surface roughness (Ra) and Vickers microhardness (VH) before and after bleaching with 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α = 0.05).The results showed that bleaching produced no significant changes in ΔE<sub>00</sub>, Ra, or Vickers hardness number (VHN) for VE, LU, or SB (<i>P</i> > 0.05). VB alone showed a significant reduction in hardness (454 → 323 HV; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Post-staining ΔE<sub>00</sub> values remained below the 1.8 clinical acceptability threshold for LU and SB but slightly exceeded it for the non-bleached VE group (≤2.2) and were high for VB (>8). Regardless of bleaching, VB exhibited the greatest color change, whereas SB had the lowest hardness. Ra values for SB and VB were above the critical threshold for bacterial adhesion (0.02 µm).Although a single session of 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in-office bleaching significantly decreases the hardness of unglazed feldspathic ceramic, it does not compromise the surface integrity or color stability of hybrid CAD/CAM materials. Therefore, the tested hybrid materials can be safely subjected to 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-based in-office bleaching without requiring surface pretreatment or postoperative replacement due to material degradation. However, restorative materials should be selected based on a comprehensive assessment of esthetic and mechanical performance to ensure long-term clinical success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1816535
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of 32% Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching on Surface Properties and Staining Susceptibility of CAD/CAM Hybrid and Feldspathic Ceramics Under Simultaneous Thermocycling–Staining Challenge

Arief Cahyanto, Ali L. Alkhatab, Nazar M. Allawi, Ahmed Maged et al.
European Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of 32% Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching on Surface Properties and Staining Susceptibility of CAD/CAM Hybrid and Feldspathic Ceramics Under Simultaneous Thermocycling–Staining Challenge

Arief Cahyanto, Ali L. Alkhatab, Nazar M. Allawi, Ahmed Maged, Nesrine A. Elsahn
article en

Abstract

Resistance to post-bleaching staining and preservation of surface properties are critical to long-term durability of restorations. This study evaluated the effect of 32% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) in-office bleaching gel on surface roughness (Ra), microhardness, and staining susceptibility of three hybrid computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials compared with a feldspathic ceramic, subjected to a combined thermocycling-staining protocol.Slice specimens (<i>n</i> = 14/material) were prepared from hybrid ceramic materials: Vita Enamic (VE); Lava Ultimate (LU); Shofu Block HC (SB); and from a feldspathic ceramic material, VitaBlocs Mark II (VB), which served as the control. Seven slices per material underwent CIEDE2000 color difference analysis (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) after simultaneous staining and thermocycling (1,000 cycles, 5-55°C), with or without a prior bleaching procedure using 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> gel for three 15-minute cycles. The remaining slices were evaluated for surface roughness (Ra) and Vickers microhardness (VH) before and after bleaching with 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α = 0.05).The results showed that bleaching produced no significant changes in ΔE<sub>00</sub>, Ra, or Vickers hardness number (VHN) for VE, LU, or SB (<i>P</i> > 0.05). VB alone showed a significant reduction in hardness (454 → 323 HV; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Post-staining ΔE<sub>00</sub> values remained below the 1.8 clinical acceptability threshold for LU and SB but slightly exceeded it for the non-bleached VE group (≤2.2) and were high for VB (>8). Regardless of bleaching, VB exhibited the greatest color change, whereas SB had the lowest hardness. Ra values for SB and VB were above the critical threshold for bacterial adhesion (0.02 µm).Although a single session of 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in-office bleaching significantly decreases the hardness of unglazed feldspathic ceramic, it does not compromise the surface integrity or color stability of hybrid CAD/CAM materials. Therefore, the tested hybrid materials can be safely subjected to 32% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-based in-office bleaching without requiring surface pretreatment or postoperative replacement due to material degradation. However, restorative materials should be selected based on a comprehensive assessment of esthetic and mechanical performance to ensure long-term clinical success.

European Journal of Dentistry
Cairo University (EG), Ajman University (AE), City University Ajman (AE)
Ajman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.