The social cognition and object relations scale is reliable, valid, and ethical in clinical practice and research: Comment on Sinclair et al. (2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Assessment
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001437
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The social cognition and object relations scale is reliable, valid, and ethical in clinical practice and research: Comment on Sinclair et al. (2023).

Jared R. Ruchensky, Jeremy M. Ridenour, Barry Dauphin, John H. Porcerelli et al.
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Testing and Assessment
article

The social cognition and object relations scale is reliable, valid, and ethical in clinical practice and research: Comment on Sinclair et al. (2023).

Jared R. Ruchensky, Jeremy M. Ridenour, Barry Dauphin, John H. Porcerelli, Caleb J. Siefert, Mark A. Blais, Michelle Stein, A. Jill Clemence, Katie C. Lewis
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological AssessmentVol. 38(3)
Austen Riggs Center (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Rutland Regional Medical Center (US), Augusta University Health (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US), University of Detroit Mercy (US), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.