Market Manipulation and Corporate Risk‐Taking

ABSTRACT We investigate the impact of market manipulation on corporate risk‐taking. We identify suspicious market manipulation in China's stock market using a detection model for closing price manipulation and adopt the closing auction mechanism reform, launched by the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2018, as an exogenous policy shock that curbs manipulation. We find that market manipulation significantly reduces corporate risk‐taking. A 1‐standard‐deviation increase in manipulation frequency leads to a decline in the standard deviation of return on assets (ROA) and return on sales (ROS) by 26.2% and 24.4% of their respective sample means. Mechanism tests show that market manipulation deteriorates market quality (reducing liquidity and price informativeness and increasing mispricing), and further decreases corporate risk‐taking through two channels: impeding managerial price‐learning and raising the cost of capital. Our study reveals the detrimental effects of market manipulation on the real economy and its mechanisms, and provides new evidence for the feedback effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Management
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.70029
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Manipulation and Corporate Risk‐Taking

Jie Liu, Conghui Hu, Yangfa Chen, Xiao Liu et al.
Financial Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Market Manipulation and Corporate Risk‐Taking

Jie Liu, Conghui Hu, Yangfa Chen, Xiao Liu, Weili Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the impact of market manipulation on corporate risk‐taking. We identify suspicious market manipulation in China's stock market using a detection model for closing price manipulation and adopt the closing auction mechanism reform, launched by the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2018, as an exogenous policy shock that curbs manipulation. We find that market manipulation significantly reduces corporate risk‐taking. A 1‐standard‐deviation increase in manipulation frequency leads to a decline in the standard deviation of return on assets (ROA) and return on sales (ROS) by 26.2% and 24.4% of their respective sample means. Mechanism tests show that market manipulation deteriorates market quality (reducing liquidity and price informativeness and increasing mispricing), and further decreases corporate risk‐taking through two channels: impeding managerial price‐learning and raising the cost of capital. Our study reveals the detrimental effects of market manipulation on the real economy and its mechanisms, and provides new evidence for the feedback effect.

Financial Management
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.