A Critical Look at the ‘Literacy Craze’: Issues and Recommendations

Literacy has gained significant attention in applied linguistics and language education, with various types of literacy (e.g., multimodal literacy, assessment literacy, feedback literacy, digital literacy and artificial intelligence literacy) being proposed and researched. In this Viewpoint article, we offer a critical examination of this ‘literacy craze,’ which may lead to excessive specification and conceptual boundaries, thereby weakening the pedagogical value and applicability of research outcomes. We propose a tentative framework comprising four dimensions – that is, scope, uniqueness, utility and generativity – to evaluate and determine whether a specific type of ‘literacy’ is conceptually justified, theoretically coherent and pedagogically meaningful. We conclude by calling for future research on ‘literacies’ to be conducted in an academically responsible and pedagogically impactful way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RELC Journal
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882261419167
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Look at the ‘Literacy Craze’: Issues and Recommendations

Rui Yuan, Kailun Wang
RELC Journal
Literacy, Media, and Education
article

A Critical Look at the ‘Literacy Craze’: Issues and Recommendations

Rui Yuan, Kailun Wang
article en

Abstract

Literacy has gained significant attention in applied linguistics and language education, with various types of literacy (e.g., multimodal literacy, assessment literacy, feedback literacy, digital literacy and artificial intelligence literacy) being proposed and researched. In this Viewpoint article, we offer a critical examination of this ‘literacy craze,’ which may lead to excessive specification and conceptual boundaries, thereby weakening the pedagogical value and applicability of research outcomes. We propose a tentative framework comprising four dimensions – that is, scope, uniqueness, utility and generativity – to evaluate and determine whether a specific type of ‘literacy’ is conceptually justified, theoretically coherent and pedagogically meaningful. We conclude by calling for future research on ‘literacies’ to be conducted in an academically responsible and pedagogically impactful way.

RELC Journal
University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Literacy, Media, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.