Mapping cyberbullying research: A systematic analysis of thematic trends and interdisciplinary integration

Despite growing research on cyberbullying, studies in social science and computer science remain largely disconnected, limiting interdisciplinary advancements. This study systematically analyzed 2427 cyberbullying-related publications using bibliometric analysis and structural topic modeling to identify thematic trends and disciplinary differences. Results revealed that a topic regarding cyberbullying detection was the most dominant theme (9.9%), especially prevalent in computer science, reflecting the strong emphasis of the field on AI-based monitoring systems. In contrast, topics such as victimization and depression (4.3%) and teacher roles (6.2%) were more prominent in social science, highlighting the focus on psychological impacts and educational interventions. Significant differences in topic prevalence between disciplines underscore a clear divide: technical detection methods dominate computer science, whereas human-centered approaches shape social science. We discuss opportunities to integrate these approaches to foster interdisciplinary solutions for cyberbullying prevention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100967
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping cyberbullying research: A systematic analysis of thematic trends and interdisciplinary integration

Garrett M. Dancik, Eunhye Park, Kwangwon Lee, Young-Eun Lee
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Mapping cyberbullying research: A systematic analysis of thematic trends and interdisciplinary integration

Garrett M. Dancik, Eunhye Park, Kwangwon Lee, Young-Eun Lee
article en

Abstract

Despite growing research on cyberbullying, studies in social science and computer science remain largely disconnected, limiting interdisciplinary advancements. This study systematically analyzed 2427 cyberbullying-related publications using bibliometric analysis and structural topic modeling to identify thematic trends and disciplinary differences. Results revealed that a topic regarding cyberbullying detection was the most dominant theme (9.9%), especially prevalent in computer science, reflecting the strong emphasis of the field on AI-based monitoring systems. In contrast, topics such as victimization and depression (4.3%) and teacher roles (6.2%) were more prominent in social science, highlighting the focus on psychological impacts and educational interventions. Significant differences in topic prevalence between disciplines underscore a clear divide: technical detection methods dominate computer science, whereas human-centered approaches shape social science. We discuss opportunities to integrate these approaches to foster interdisciplinary solutions for cyberbullying prevention.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 21
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping cyberbullying research: A systematic analysis of thematic trends and interdisciplinary integration — Garrett M. Dancik, Eunhye Park, et al. · Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS