After Action Reviews, Learning Lessons and Post-Crisis Assessment of Crisis and Risk Communication

After-Action Reviews (AARs) have become essential tools for organizational learning and development, particularly in post-crisis contexts such as public health emergencies. This study examines the processes, characteristics, and challenges of AARs, focusing on their application during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conceptualize AARs as communication processes that enact, encode, and disseminate lessons learned, contributing to organizational resilience and innovation. By analyzing a sample of COVID-19 AARs from various organizations, we explore the variability in AAR form, structure, and content across different organizational levels. Our findings reveal consistent themes in assessment and recommendations, particularly emphasizing the importance of communication, coordination, and inclusive planning for vulnerable populations. Results highlight the significance of AARs as tools for translating crisis experiences into actionable insights for future pandemic preparedness and response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2454243
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

After Action Reviews, Learning Lessons and Post-Crisis Assessment of Crisis and Risk Communication

Matthew W. Seeger, M.A. Zakaria, Najma Akhther
Health Communication
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

After Action Reviews, Learning Lessons and Post-Crisis Assessment of Crisis and Risk Communication

Matthew W. Seeger, M.A. Zakaria, Najma Akhther
article en

Abstract

After-Action Reviews (AARs) have become essential tools for organizational learning and development, particularly in post-crisis contexts such as public health emergencies. This study examines the processes, characteristics, and challenges of AARs, focusing on their application during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conceptualize AARs as communication processes that enact, encode, and disseminate lessons learned, contributing to organizational resilience and innovation. By analyzing a sample of COVID-19 AARs from various organizations, we explore the variability in AAR form, structure, and content across different organizational levels. Our findings reveal consistent themes in assessment and recommendations, particularly emphasizing the importance of communication, coordination, and inclusive planning for vulnerable populations. Results highlight the significance of AARs as tools for translating crisis experiences into actionable insights for future pandemic preparedness and response.

Health CommunicationVol. 41(3)
Wayne State University (US), State University of New York at Oswego (US), University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.