Exploring the current engineering challenges of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with fundamental materials science: A review

Abstract Lithium sulfur batteries offer high theoretical energy density and low material cost, but their practical use depends on electrolyte systems that satisfy several fundamental criteria. Solid state electrolytes provide a promising route by removing the liquid phase and improving safety. This review outlines the reaction pathways in lithium sulfur cells and the mechanisms of ion transport in solid electrolytes, followed by a generational comparison of major electrolyte classes, including polymers, oxides, sulfides, halides, garnets and composite systems. Four key criteria for solid state electrolyte use in lithium sulfur batteries are then examined: stability with electrodes, polysulfide behaviour, sulfur utilization and mechanical versatility. Existing strategies are evaluated in terms of how effectively they satisfy each requirement. Finally, two solid state cell designs that meet all identified criteria are proposed, together with quantitative considerations for electrolyte and cathode design. These insights provide a framework for guiding the development of practical solid state lithium sulfur batteries. Highlights This work identifies the key requirements that solid electrolytes must meet to enable high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. It also highlights two practical cell designs that satisfy these requirements and point toward viable solid-state lithium–sulfur technology. Discussions The lack of quantitative data on polysulfide solubility in solid polymers remains a major barrier to rational design of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries, raising the question of whether industry should invest heavily in this chemistry before these fundamentals are resolved. Although solid electrolytes are widely promoted as a safer alternative to liquid systems, their real-world reliability against lithium dendrites remains unsettled, especially under manufacturing imperfections and high-power operating conditions. The practical energy and sustainability benefits of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries depend not only on materials breakthroughs but also on whether new manufacturing lines—potentially requiring ceramic processing and polymer casting hybrids—can be deployed at commercial scale without prohibitive cost or environmental burden. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRS Energy & Sustainability
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-026-00149-6
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the current engineering challenges of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with fundamental materials science: A review

Ziwei Jeffrey Yang, Zhuangnan Li, James Moloney, Yan Wang et al.
MRS Energy & Sustainability
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Exploring the current engineering challenges of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with fundamental materials science: A review

Ziwei Jeffrey Yang, Zhuangnan Li, James Moloney, Yan Wang, Manish Chhowalla, Jun Yao Andrew Wong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lithium sulfur batteries offer high theoretical energy density and low material cost, but their practical use depends on electrolyte systems that satisfy several fundamental criteria. Solid state electrolytes provide a promising route by removing the liquid phase and improving safety. This review outlines the reaction pathways in lithium sulfur cells and the mechanisms of ion transport in solid electrolytes, followed by a generational comparison of major electrolyte classes, including polymers, oxides, sulfides, halides, garnets and composite systems. Four key criteria for solid state electrolyte use in lithium sulfur batteries are then examined: stability with electrodes, polysulfide behaviour, sulfur utilization and mechanical versatility. Existing strategies are evaluated in terms of how effectively they satisfy each requirement. Finally, two solid state cell designs that meet all identified criteria are proposed, together with quantitative considerations for electrolyte and cathode design. These insights provide a framework for guiding the development of practical solid state lithium sulfur batteries. Highlights This work identifies the key requirements that solid electrolytes must meet to enable high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. It also highlights two practical cell designs that satisfy these requirements and point toward viable solid-state lithium–sulfur technology. Discussions The lack of quantitative data on polysulfide solubility in solid polymers remains a major barrier to rational design of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries, raising the question of whether industry should invest heavily in this chemistry before these fundamentals are resolved. Although solid electrolytes are widely promoted as a safer alternative to liquid systems, their real-world reliability against lithium dendrites remains unsettled, especially under manufacturing imperfections and high-power operating conditions. The practical energy and sustainability benefits of solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries depend not only on materials breakthroughs but also on whether new manufacturing lines—potentially requiring ceramic processing and polymer casting hybrids—can be deployed at commercial scale without prohibitive cost or environmental burden. Graphical Abstract

MRS Energy & Sustainability
University of Cambridge (GB), Zhejiang University (CN)
Henry Royce Institute, King's College London, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.