Impact of Selected JavaScript Engines on the Performance of Mobile Hybrid Applications

ABSTRACT This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of different JavaScript engines in the context of React Native hybrid applications, with a particular focus on the differences between JavaScript Interface (JSI) and bridge architectures. The study conducted a series of performance tests on the most popular JavaScript engines, including Hermes, JavaScriptCore (JSC), and V8, using a set of standard benchmarks and use cases. As part of the research, a QuickJS engine communication layer was created, and necessary changes were proposed to the React Native framework and engine code. The testing methodology included measurements of application package size, interaction time, memory usage, UI rendering performance, and operation execution speed. Tests were conducted on identical components implemented in both React Native architectures, allowing a direct comparison of the impact of architecture on JavaScript engine performance. The results of the experiment indicate differences in engine performance depending on the scenario and describe the differences between their use in bridge and JSI architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Software Evolution and Process
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.70086
Primary Topic
Mobile and Web Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Selected JavaScript Engines on the Performance of Mobile Hybrid Applications

Jarosław Bylina, Łukasz Kurant
Journal of Software Evolution and Process
Mobile and Web Applications
article

Impact of Selected JavaScript Engines on the Performance of Mobile Hybrid Applications

Jarosław Bylina, Łukasz Kurant
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of different JavaScript engines in the context of React Native hybrid applications, with a particular focus on the differences between JavaScript Interface (JSI) and bridge architectures. The study conducted a series of performance tests on the most popular JavaScript engines, including Hermes, JavaScriptCore (JSC), and V8, using a set of standard benchmarks and use cases. As part of the research, a QuickJS engine communication layer was created, and necessary changes were proposed to the React Native framework and engine code. The testing methodology included measurements of application package size, interaction time, memory usage, UI rendering performance, and operation execution speed. Tests were conducted on identical components implemented in both React Native architectures, allowing a direct comparison of the impact of architecture on JavaScript engine performance. The results of the experiment indicate differences in engine performance depending on the scenario and describe the differences between their use in bridge and JSI architectures.

Journal of Software Evolution and ProcessVol. 38(2)
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mobile and Web Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.