Profaning as Artful Inquiry: Fuck Around and Find Out . . . the Seductive Lure Into the Sublime

This paper unsettles the easy optimism and moral aesthetics that can domesticate arts-based research into consumable, uplifting products. Drawing on profane methodologies and artists who have jolted us, we embrace irreverence, obscenity, and the “fuck it” aesthetic—not as nihilism, but as a method to question what is obscured when inquiry is aestheticized as moral good, empowerment, or evocative transformation. We argue that arts-based research risks becoming methodological word-art—superficially disruptive yet institutionally safe—where beauty substitutes for ethics and aesthetic cues replace accountability. Profaning becomes a methodological stance that refuses tidy resolution, resists redemptive outputs, and remains with mess, failure, and unresolved tensions. Profaning artful inquiry is an ethic of discomfort, an invitation to fuck around and find out what research might be when stripped of redemptive sheen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261420204
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profaning as Artful Inquiry: Fuck Around and Find Out . . . the Seductive Lure Into the Sublime

Lorien S. Jordan, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, Dunn Mr
Qualitative Inquiry
Artistic and Creative Research
article

Profaning as Artful Inquiry: Fuck Around and Find Out . . . the Seductive Lure Into the Sublime

Lorien S. Jordan, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, Dunn Mr
article en

Abstract

This paper unsettles the easy optimism and moral aesthetics that can domesticate arts-based research into consumable, uplifting products. Drawing on profane methodologies and artists who have jolted us, we embrace irreverence, obscenity, and the “fuck it” aesthetic—not as nihilism, but as a method to question what is obscured when inquiry is aestheticized as moral good, empowerment, or evocative transformation. We argue that arts-based research risks becoming methodological word-art—superficially disruptive yet institutionally safe—where beauty substitutes for ethics and aesthetic cues replace accountability. Profaning becomes a methodological stance that refuses tidy resolution, resists redemptive outputs, and remains with mess, failure, and unresolved tensions. Profaning artful inquiry is an ethic of discomfort, an invitation to fuck around and find out what research might be when stripped of redemptive sheen.

Qualitative Inquiry
University of South Florida (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Profaning as Artful Inquiry: Fuck Around and Find Out . . . the Seductive Lure Into the Sublime — Lorien S. Jordan, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, et al. · Qualitative Inquiry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS