“What do you want this information for?”: cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for outcomes research

Arthritis research in Canada has historically lacked focus on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), as studies show limited reporting of equity-related factors and underrepresentation of participants who are historically from underserved communities. To address this, the objective of this study was to gather feedback from arthritis researchers in Canada to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for arthritis outcomes research. Cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals who (1) have experience conducting arthritis research; (2) reside in and/or conduct their research in Canada; and (3) speak English or French. A demographic survey developed based on the PROGRESS-Plus framework, which includes characteristics that stratify health opportunities and outcomes (Place of residence; Race, culture, ethnicity, language; Occupation; Gender, sex; Religion; Education; Socioeconomic status; Social capital; Plus), was iteratively refined through the ‘think-aloud’ technique where participants provided insights and shared perspectives. Thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Twenty arthritis researchers (11 men) in Canada participated in cognitive interviews. All participants described how the health equity-focused demographic survey was perceived as a feasible and relevant tool. However, some participants expressed concern about questions that focus on perceived sensitive factors (e.g., religion, sexual orientation), while emphasizing there needs to be strong rationale for inclusion to establish patient trust. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) Purpose for collecting demographic data from a health equity lens; (2) Implications of collecting health equity information for data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and (3) Suggestions to enhance survey usability. A health equity-focused demographic survey developed and refined through cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers may serve as a pragmatic tool to support the integration of EDI in arthritis outcomes research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Rheumatology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-026-00614-2
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What do you want this information for?”: cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for outcomes research

Mary A. De Vera, Charlene Ronquillo, Natasha Trehan, Codie A. Primeau et al.
BMC Rheumatology
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

“What do you want this information for?”: cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for outcomes research

Mary A. De Vera, Charlene Ronquillo, Natasha Trehan, Codie A. Primeau, Mark Harrison, Michael Kuluva, Niki Oveisi, Anna Samson, J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta, Megan M. Thomas, Nikki Bhatti, Aniruddha Methi
article en

Abstract

Arthritis research in Canada has historically lacked focus on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), as studies show limited reporting of equity-related factors and underrepresentation of participants who are historically from underserved communities. To address this, the objective of this study was to gather feedback from arthritis researchers in Canada to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for arthritis outcomes research. Cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals who (1) have experience conducting arthritis research; (2) reside in and/or conduct their research in Canada; and (3) speak English or French. A demographic survey developed based on the PROGRESS-Plus framework, which includes characteristics that stratify health opportunities and outcomes (Place of residence; Race, culture, ethnicity, language; Occupation; Gender, sex; Religion; Education; Socioeconomic status; Social capital; Plus), was iteratively refined through the ‘think-aloud’ technique where participants provided insights and shared perspectives. Thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Twenty arthritis researchers (11 men) in Canada participated in cognitive interviews. All participants described how the health equity-focused demographic survey was perceived as a feasible and relevant tool. However, some participants expressed concern about questions that focus on perceived sensitive factors (e.g., religion, sexual orientation), while emphasizing there needs to be strong rationale for inclusion to establish patient trust. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) Purpose for collecting demographic data from a health equity lens; (2) Implications of collecting health equity information for data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and (3) Suggestions to enhance survey usability. A health equity-focused demographic survey developed and refined through cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers may serve as a pragmatic tool to support the integration of EDI in arthritis outcomes research.

BMC RheumatologyVol. 10(1)
Western University (CA), University of British Columbia Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), St. Paul's Hospital (CA), Research Canada (CA), Check Point (Israel) (IL), Arthritis Research Centre of Canada (CA), Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (CA), Joint Research Center (ES), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.