Validating an adaptive digital assessment of youth mental health needs: a cross-sectional study

Digital mental health assessments can effectively link young people to appropriate health services. Current approaches often lack personalization, failing to recognize the complex and multidimensional needs of young people. 1734 young people aged 12-25 years completed seven standardized measures (49 items) using a digital health assessment tool while receiving mental health care. A multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) was developed to predict scores on seven standardized scales, spanning clinical symptoms, suicidality, functioning, and alcohol use. Different adaptive tests were simulated under various stopping criteria configurations. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed to determine the accuracy and efficiency of the multidimensional assessment. By administering a personalized subset of items to each individual, the average number of assessment items could be reduced by 69% while maintaining excellent agreement with full-length scores for suicidality (ICC = 0.96), anxiety (ICC = 0.92), and alcohol use (ICC = 0.91), and good agreement for psychological distress (ICC = 0.88), functioning (ICC = 0.86), psychosis (ICC = 0.78), and mania (ICC = 0.75). Estimated average assessment time decreased from 10.5 minutes to under 3.3 minutes (49 items reduced to 15.3 items, per person, with mean absolute agreement ICC = 0.87). This adaptive digital assessment can screen across key domains to identify mental health needs and complexity in youth mental health, leading to rapid decisions about treatment needs and care pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02374-2
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating an adaptive digital assessment of youth mental health needs: a cross-sectional study

William Capon, Frank Iorfino, Elizabeth Scott, Mathew Varidel et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Validating an adaptive digital assessment of youth mental health needs: a cross-sectional study

William Capon, Frank Iorfino, Elizabeth Scott, Mathew Varidel, Jacob J. Crouse, Luke J Borgnolo, H. LaMonica
article en

Abstract

Digital mental health assessments can effectively link young people to appropriate health services. Current approaches often lack personalization, failing to recognize the complex and multidimensional needs of young people. 1734 young people aged 12-25 years completed seven standardized measures (49 items) using a digital health assessment tool while receiving mental health care. A multidimensional computerized adaptive test (MCAT) was developed to predict scores on seven standardized scales, spanning clinical symptoms, suicidality, functioning, and alcohol use. Different adaptive tests were simulated under various stopping criteria configurations. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed to determine the accuracy and efficiency of the multidimensional assessment. By administering a personalized subset of items to each individual, the average number of assessment items could be reduced by 69% while maintaining excellent agreement with full-length scores for suicidality (ICC = 0.96), anxiety (ICC = 0.92), and alcohol use (ICC = 0.91), and good agreement for psychological distress (ICC = 0.88), functioning (ICC = 0.86), psychosis (ICC = 0.78), and mania (ICC = 0.75). Estimated average assessment time decreased from 10.5 minutes to under 3.3 minutes (49 items reduced to 15.3 items, per person, with mean absolute agreement ICC = 0.87). This adaptive digital assessment can screen across key domains to identify mental health needs and complexity in youth mental health, leading to rapid decisions about treatment needs and care pathways.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 9(1)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.