Application of the Thermo-RAdiometric Normalization of Crop Observations (TRANCO) Back in Time: An Assessment of the Potential for Crop Time-Series Generalization to Past Years Using Wheat as a Proxy

Crop type maps are essential for food security. However, there is a gap in information for worldwide maps that, at the same time, cover a wide period of time. The inability of classification algorithms to generalize information across years is one of the main reasons for this lack of information. This study aims to advance this direction by normalizing annual time series of wheat crops using the accumulation of Growing Degree Days (GDDs). Based on the Crop Data Layer (CDL) crop-type maps and Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery, we built yearly time series for the period 2008–2020. Then, we tested the performance of two normalization approaches: TRANCO, which uses Growing Degree Days (GDDs) and Crop Calendars to normalize time-series data; and Time Windows, which uses Crop Calendars to define wheat’s biofix dates and normalize time-series data. Furthermore, we compared them with a Baseline, meaning a time series without further processing. Such performance was tested in two main ways: By computing the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distances between time series and their average behavior, and by training random forest classifiers. For the latter, we defined a training period (2017–2020) during which we trained the models, and a validation period (2008–2016), during which we validated them on years the models were not trained on. We found that TRANCO was the best normalization approach for bringing the time-series closer to a common behavior (JM = 0.3), compared to Time windows (JM = 0.4) or the Baseline. Also, it achieved the best classification results (F1 = 0.779), compared to Time windows (F1 = 0.71) or the Baseline (F1 = 0.73), and, in addition, TRANCO’s classifier was the most stable throughout the validation period, empowering past crop type classifications with classifiers trained in recent years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040571
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the Thermo-RAdiometric Normalization of Crop Observations (TRANCO) Back in Time: An Assessment of the Potential for Crop Time-Series Generalization to Past Years Using Wheat as a Proxy

Emilio Guirado, María J. Salinas‐Bonillo, Juanma Cintas, Ítalo Moletto‐Lobos et al.
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Application of the Thermo-RAdiometric Normalization of Crop Observations (TRANCO) Back in Time: An Assessment of the Potential for Crop Time-Series Generalization to Past Years Using Wheat as a Proxy

Emilio Guirado, María J. Salinas‐Bonillo, Juanma Cintas, Ítalo Moletto‐Lobos, Inbal Becker‐Reshef, Javier Cabello, Belen Franch, Carmen López-Zayas, Jaime Martínez-Valderrama, Tamara Escamilla
article en

Abstract

Crop type maps are essential for food security. However, there is a gap in information for worldwide maps that, at the same time, cover a wide period of time. The inability of classification algorithms to generalize information across years is one of the main reasons for this lack of information. This study aims to advance this direction by normalizing annual time series of wheat crops using the accumulation of Growing Degree Days (GDDs). Based on the Crop Data Layer (CDL) crop-type maps and Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery, we built yearly time series for the period 2008–2020. Then, we tested the performance of two normalization approaches: TRANCO, which uses Growing Degree Days (GDDs) and Crop Calendars to normalize time-series data; and Time Windows, which uses Crop Calendars to define wheat’s biofix dates and normalize time-series data. Furthermore, we compared them with a Baseline, meaning a time series without further processing. Such performance was tested in two main ways: By computing the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distances between time series and their average behavior, and by training random forest classifiers. For the latter, we defined a training period (2017–2020) during which we trained the models, and a validation period (2008–2016), during which we validated them on years the models were not trained on. We found that TRANCO was the best normalization approach for bringing the time-series closer to a common behavior (JM = 0.3), compared to Time windows (JM = 0.4) or the Baseline. Also, it achieved the best classification results (F1 = 0.779), compared to Time windows (F1 = 0.71) or the Baseline (F1 = 0.73), and, in addition, TRANCO’s classifier was the most stable throughout the validation period, empowering past crop type classifications with classifiers trained in recent years.

Remote SensingVol. 18(4)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València (ES), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (US), Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas (ES), University of Almería (ES), University of Maryland, College Park (US), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.