Satisfaction and experience of care among women with abortion-related complications from Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean

Although abortion is a frequent event in women’s reproductive life and abortion-related complications have negative consequences for women’s health and wellbeing, little is known about the quality of abortion care. To improve the quality, women’s experience of care and satisfaction, need to be further standardized and studied. This study aims to assess experience and satisfaction with post-abortion care in Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). We performed a secondary analysis from the World Health Organization Multi-Country Survey on Abortion. This analysis uses data from women with abortion-related complications who completed the exit survey in the form of an audio computer-assisted self-interview. Using construct validity, exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency coefficients we developed scales based on 12 items on experience of care and on 5 items on satisfaction. We performed logistic regression analyses to gain a better understanding of which clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with poor experience of care and poor satisfaction. Three thousand one hundred seventy-eight women were included (299 from LAC and 2879 from Africa). Most women (85.1%) had mild or moderate abortion-related complications. The mean total score on experience of care was 2.96 (± 2.43), with a possible score range from 0 to 12. The mean total score regarding satisfaction was 1.05 (± 0.96), with a possible score range from 0 to 5. Women with no education were more likely to have poor experience of care compared to women with primary/secondary education. Women with no running water at home, with no adequacy of household income for personal needs, with no ability to save money and who did not earn their own money were more likely to have poor experience of care and poor satisfaction. Women treated in facilities with better capability to provide postabortion care were less likely to have poor satisfaction. Socioeconomically vulnerable women reported worse experiences and satisfaction with post-abortion care. Facilities with better capabilities improved satisfaction. Utilizing and implementing standardized scales and scores is essential for enhancing post-abortion experience of care improving care quality, and informing effective health policies and practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26399-0
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Satisfaction and experience of care among women with abortion-related complications from Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean

Vanessa Brizuela, Hedieh Mehrtash, Rachidatou Compaoré, M. C. Costa et al.
BMC Public Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Satisfaction and experience of care among women with abortion-related complications from Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean

Vanessa Brizuela, Hedieh Mehrtash, Rachidatou Compaoré, M. C. Costa, Nélio Neves Veiga-Junior, Denis Barbosa Cacique, Negli Gallardo, Mariana Romero, ÖzgeTUNÇALP, Luiz Francisco Baccaro
article en

Abstract

Although abortion is a frequent event in women’s reproductive life and abortion-related complications have negative consequences for women’s health and wellbeing, little is known about the quality of abortion care. To improve the quality, women’s experience of care and satisfaction, need to be further standardized and studied. This study aims to assess experience and satisfaction with post-abortion care in Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). We performed a secondary analysis from the World Health Organization Multi-Country Survey on Abortion. This analysis uses data from women with abortion-related complications who completed the exit survey in the form of an audio computer-assisted self-interview. Using construct validity, exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency coefficients we developed scales based on 12 items on experience of care and on 5 items on satisfaction. We performed logistic regression analyses to gain a better understanding of which clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with poor experience of care and poor satisfaction. Three thousand one hundred seventy-eight women were included (299 from LAC and 2879 from Africa). Most women (85.1%) had mild or moderate abortion-related complications. The mean total score on experience of care was 2.96 (± 2.43), with a possible score range from 0 to 12. The mean total score regarding satisfaction was 1.05 (± 0.96), with a possible score range from 0 to 5. Women with no education were more likely to have poor experience of care compared to women with primary/secondary education. Women with no running water at home, with no adequacy of household income for personal needs, with no ability to save money and who did not earn their own money were more likely to have poor experience of care and poor satisfaction. Women treated in facilities with better capability to provide postabortion care were less likely to have poor satisfaction. Socioeconomically vulnerable women reported worse experiences and satisfaction with post-abortion care. Facilities with better capabilities improved satisfaction. Utilizing and implementing standardized scales and scores is essential for enhancing post-abortion experience of care improving care quality, and informing effective health policies and practices.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), World Health Organization (CH), Center for the Study of State and Society (AR), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (BF)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.