Research on the impact of different teaching methods on students’ spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking

Spatial ability is a fundamental cognitive skill that is a strong predictor of success in STEM education. Three-dimensional geometric thinking is the formalized expression of spatial ability when solving three-dimensional geometric problems. Although technology and embodied cognition are regarded as potential means to promote students' spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking development, currently there are few studies focusing on the relative influence of different teaching methods on students' spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking, as well as the moderating effect of students' initial spatial ability on teaching methods. Based on the theory of multimedia learning and cognitive load, this study designs a teaching method that integrates GeoGebra (a dynamic visualization tool) and gestures (a form of embodied cognition). The study adopted a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test control group design. The differences in the independent and integrated effects of GeoGebra and gesture cognitive enhancement methods, as well as the moderating role of students' initial spatial ability, were explored. The research results show that: (1) Although the spatial ability scores of all teaching groups have significantly improved from the pre-test to the post-test, there is no significant difference among the three teaching methods. (2) There are significant differences in the influence of the three teaching methods on students' three-dimensional geometric thinking. (3) Students' initial spatial ability does not significantly moderate the effect of teaching methods, but it is the main predictive factor for the post-test of spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking. (4) The overall influence of students' initial spatial ability on three-dimensional geometric thinking is greater than that of teaching methods. This study provides reference suggestions for teachers to design spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking cultivation programs that match the differences in students' spatial abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1744734
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the impact of different teaching methods on students’ spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking

Wenlan Zhang, Tanjun Ma
Frontiers in Psychology
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Research on the impact of different teaching methods on students’ spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking

Wenlan Zhang, Tanjun Ma
article en

Abstract

Spatial ability is a fundamental cognitive skill that is a strong predictor of success in STEM education. Three-dimensional geometric thinking is the formalized expression of spatial ability when solving three-dimensional geometric problems. Although technology and embodied cognition are regarded as potential means to promote students' spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking development, currently there are few studies focusing on the relative influence of different teaching methods on students' spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking, as well as the moderating effect of students' initial spatial ability on teaching methods. Based on the theory of multimedia learning and cognitive load, this study designs a teaching method that integrates GeoGebra (a dynamic visualization tool) and gestures (a form of embodied cognition). The study adopted a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test control group design. The differences in the independent and integrated effects of GeoGebra and gesture cognitive enhancement methods, as well as the moderating role of students' initial spatial ability, were explored. The research results show that: (1) Although the spatial ability scores of all teaching groups have significantly improved from the pre-test to the post-test, there is no significant difference among the three teaching methods. (2) There are significant differences in the influence of the three teaching methods on students' three-dimensional geometric thinking. (3) Students' initial spatial ability does not significantly moderate the effect of teaching methods, but it is the main predictive factor for the post-test of spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking. (4) The overall influence of students' initial spatial ability on three-dimensional geometric thinking is greater than that of teaching methods. This study provides reference suggestions for teachers to design spatial ability and three-dimensional geometric thinking cultivation programs that match the differences in students' spatial abilities.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.