Quantifying environmental trade-offs of urban form-function compactness

Abstract Compact urban form is increasingly embedded in global sustainability agendas, yet its environmental trade-offs are still poorly understood. Previous research has mainly emphasized physical form and single outcomes, neglecting functional dimensions and potential ecological trade-offs due to the lack of fine-grained data. Here, we introduce a multi-source data fusion-based urban functional compactness (UFC) indicator and integrate it with urban physical compactness (UPC) into a form-function coupling framework. Using structural equation modeling across 176 Chinese cities, we reveal dual impacts: stronger UFC enhances land use efficiency and public transport performance but is associated with reduced green space provision and weaker waste treatment. A 1% increase in UFC raises infrastructure utilization efficiency by about 2% while also indirectly elevating environmental pollution by 0.74%. In contrast, a 1% increase in UPC directly enhances water conservation by 3% and reduces energy consumption by 6% but indirectly increases pollution impacts by 2.59%. These findings challenge the assumption that compactness is inherently green, demonstrating instead that form–function coupling produces divergent pathways: efficiency gains coexisting with amplified ecological risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae452c
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying environmental trade-offs of urban form-function compactness

Zhibang Xu, Jinshan Yan, Lina Tang, Yashi Wu et al.
Environmental Research Letters
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Quantifying environmental trade-offs of urban form-function compactness

Zhibang Xu, Jinshan Yan, Lina Tang, Yashi Wu, Ting Lan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Compact urban form is increasingly embedded in global sustainability agendas, yet its environmental trade-offs are still poorly understood. Previous research has mainly emphasized physical form and single outcomes, neglecting functional dimensions and potential ecological trade-offs due to the lack of fine-grained data. Here, we introduce a multi-source data fusion-based urban functional compactness (UFC) indicator and integrate it with urban physical compactness (UPC) into a form-function coupling framework. Using structural equation modeling across 176 Chinese cities, we reveal dual impacts: stronger UFC enhances land use efficiency and public transport performance but is associated with reduced green space provision and weaker waste treatment. A 1% increase in UFC raises infrastructure utilization efficiency by about 2% while also indirectly elevating environmental pollution by 0.74%. In contrast, a 1% increase in UPC directly enhances water conservation by 3% and reduces energy consumption by 6% but indirectly increases pollution impacts by 2.59%. These findings challenge the assumption that compactness is inherently green, demonstrating instead that form–function coupling produces divergent pathways: efficiency gains coexisting with amplified ecological risks.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 21(4)
Institute of Urban Environment (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying environmental trade-offs of urban form-function compactness — Zhibang Xu, Jinshan Yan, et al. · Environmental Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS