‘People need to be a bit more understanding that my body is wrecked’: A qualitative exploration of inpatient hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions

BACKGROUND: Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) is becoming increasingly common with far-reaching consequences for individuals and healthcare systems. People with MLTC often face complex care pathways through health systems - especially hospitals, which are largely configured for specialist treatment of single conditions - yet evidence on people with MLTC's lived experience in the hospital setting is limited. This study aimed to understand the hospital care experiences of people living with MLTC who had recently had an inpatient stay. METHODS: People with MLTC who had experienced an inpatient stay in hospital within the previous six months were recruited via three hospitals in England and via patient networks. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with each participant, focussing on their experiences of care from admission to discharge. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 44 people (mean age 68.4 years, 23 women) who reported living with between 2 and 11 long-term conditions, the majority of whom (96%) reported that their most recent hospital stay was unplanned, participated in the study. Three themes were constructed from the interview data, reflecting perceptions at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels. Participants' experiences were shaped by internalised narratives of hospital care, where care was expected to be focussed primarily on single conditions within a resource-constrained environment. Relationally, the degree of alignment between clinician and patient knowledge on conditions was a key contributor to whether hospital care was experienced positively or negatively, and participants' perceptions of organisational constraints to holistic care gave insights into their views on system-level barriers shaping the provision of care for MLTC in the hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of inpatient hospital care for people with MLTC are complex, diverse and shaped by expectations of care in a specialist setting configured to provide care for single conditions. Healthcare professionals should incorporate patients' experiential expertise into decision-making processes through consultation with people with lived experience of MLTC. Redesigning hospital services to provide holistic care will require flexibility to respond to the wide spectrum of MLTC experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05181-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘People need to be a bit more understanding that my body is wrecked’: A qualitative exploration of inpatient hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions

Rachel Cooper, Miles D. Witham, Chris Plummer, Sue Bellass et al.
1 citations
BMC Medicine
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
4.23
article

‘People need to be a bit more understanding that my body is wrecked’: A qualitative exploration of inpatient hospital care for people living with multiple long-term conditions

Rachel Cooper, Miles D. Witham, Chris Plummer, Sue Bellass, Avan Aihie Sayer, Lynsey Threlfall, Thomas Scharf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) is becoming increasingly common with far-reaching consequences for individuals and healthcare systems. People with MLTC often face complex care pathways through health systems - especially hospitals, which are largely configured for specialist treatment of single conditions - yet evidence on people with MLTC's lived experience in the hospital setting is limited. This study aimed to understand the hospital care experiences of people living with MLTC who had recently had an inpatient stay. METHODS: People with MLTC who had experienced an inpatient stay in hospital within the previous six months were recruited via three hospitals in England and via patient networks. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with each participant, focussing on their experiences of care from admission to discharge. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 44 people (mean age 68.4 years, 23 women) who reported living with between 2 and 11 long-term conditions, the majority of whom (96%) reported that their most recent hospital stay was unplanned, participated in the study. Three themes were constructed from the interview data, reflecting perceptions at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels. Participants' experiences were shaped by internalised narratives of hospital care, where care was expected to be focussed primarily on single conditions within a resource-constrained environment. Relationally, the degree of alignment between clinician and patient knowledge on conditions was a key contributor to whether hospital care was experienced positively or negatively, and participants' perceptions of organisational constraints to holistic care gave insights into their views on system-level barriers shaping the provision of care for MLTC in the hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of inpatient hospital care for people with MLTC are complex, diverse and shaped by expectations of care in a specialist setting configured to provide care for single conditions. Healthcare professionals should incorporate patients' experiential expertise into decision-making processes through consultation with people with lived experience of MLTC. Redesigning hospital services to provide holistic care will require flexibility to respond to the wide spectrum of MLTC experiences.

BMC MedicineVol. 24(1)
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
4.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.