Factors accounting for excess uterine cancer mortality among insured Black versus White patients treated within the same US health care system

Among insured patients treated within the same US health care system, Black patients had approximately twice the mortality risk of White patients, with 70.8% of the excess relative risk of death among Black patients being attributable to tumor characteristics, 21.4% attributable to socioeconomic status, and 7.8% un-explained. Co-morbidities, diagnostic efficiency, and treatment quality were not significant contributors relative to other factors. These findings suggest that eliminating disparities in survival between Black and White patients will require development of more effective treatments for high-risk tumor types and interventions that mitigate the negative effects of lower socioeconomic status on health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2026.104589
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors accounting for excess uterine cancer mortality among insured Black versus White patients treated within the same US health care system

Holly Finertie, Sarah Dolisca, Julie A. Schmittdiel, Devansu Tewari et al.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Factors accounting for excess uterine cancer mortality among insured Black versus White patients treated within the same US health care system

Holly Finertie, Sarah Dolisca, Julie A. Schmittdiel, Devansu Tewari, Haoyuan Zhong, Michael BOOKMAN, Claudia NAU, Elizabeth J. SUH-BURGMANN
article en

Abstract

Among insured patients treated within the same US health care system, Black patients had approximately twice the mortality risk of White patients, with 70.8% of the excess relative risk of death among Black patients being attributable to tumor characteristics, 21.4% attributable to socioeconomic status, and 7.8% un-explained. Co-morbidities, diagnostic efficiency, and treatment quality were not significant contributors relative to other factors. These findings suggest that eliminating disparities in survival between Black and White patients will require development of more effective treatments for high-risk tumor types and interventions that mitigate the negative effects of lower socioeconomic status on health.

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Gynecologic Oncology Group (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center (US), Colorado Permanente Medical Group (US)
Kaiser Permanente
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.