Correction: Transdisciplinary learning environments that stimulate co-creation and co-learning between students and external partners: an empirical exploration

To effectively prepare students for navigating complex societal and sustainability challenges, higher education institutions are increasingly experimenting with transdisciplinary learning environments (TLEs) in which students collaborate with external stakeholders across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries. This empirical study explores how TLEs in Dutch higher education are designed to support co-creation and co-learning between students and societal actors. Using a multiple case study design, eleven TLEs across research universities and universities of applied sciences were analysed. The findings reveal three types of TLEs: Consultancy TLEs (C-TLEs), where students address real-world problems posed by commissioners; Participatory TLEs (P-TLEs), where all participants are explicitly positioned as learners in co-creation processes; and Student-Led TLEs (SL-TLEs), where students initiate the challenge based on their intrinsic motivation and seek out relevant stakeholders. The pedagogical and design decisions made within each type were identified, focusing on how co-creation is facilitated across the phases of co-design, co-production, and co-dissemination, and to what extent co-learning is an explicit goal. While co-creation was often supported, co-learning—especially for stakeholders—was rarely intentionally designed for or assessed. P-TLEs were most explicit in embedding co-creation and co-learning in goals, activities, and support structures. Across cases, several enablers and barriers were identified, such as teacher roles, assessment alignment, use of physical spaces, and institutional embedding. Our findings highlight the importance of designing for “freedom within structure,” recognising learning surprises, and enabling reciprocal partnerships to strengthen TLE impact. The conclusion stresses that while TLEs hold great promise for transformative education and societal engagement, the concept and practice of co-learning remain underdeveloped. These findings call for more research and practical experimentation into supporting, assessing, and making visible the co-learning processes of all actors involved—students, teachers, and stakeholders alike—as a critical step toward realising the third mission of higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06676-4
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Transdisciplinary learning environments that stimulate co-creation and co-learning between students and external partners: an empirical exploration

Irene Visscher-Voerman, Klaasjan Visscher, Anne E. Khaled
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Correction: Transdisciplinary learning environments that stimulate co-creation and co-learning between students and external partners: an empirical exploration

Irene Visscher-Voerman, Klaasjan Visscher, Anne E. Khaled
article en

Abstract

To effectively prepare students for navigating complex societal and sustainability challenges, higher education institutions are increasingly experimenting with transdisciplinary learning environments (TLEs) in which students collaborate with external stakeholders across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries. This empirical study explores how TLEs in Dutch higher education are designed to support co-creation and co-learning between students and societal actors. Using a multiple case study design, eleven TLEs across research universities and universities of applied sciences were analysed. The findings reveal three types of TLEs: Consultancy TLEs (C-TLEs), where students address real-world problems posed by commissioners; Participatory TLEs (P-TLEs), where all participants are explicitly positioned as learners in co-creation processes; and Student-Led TLEs (SL-TLEs), where students initiate the challenge based on their intrinsic motivation and seek out relevant stakeholders. The pedagogical and design decisions made within each type were identified, focusing on how co-creation is facilitated across the phases of co-design, co-production, and co-dissemination, and to what extent co-learning is an explicit goal. While co-creation was often supported, co-learning—especially for stakeholders—was rarely intentionally designed for or assessed. P-TLEs were most explicit in embedding co-creation and co-learning in goals, activities, and support structures. Across cases, several enablers and barriers were identified, such as teacher roles, assessment alignment, use of physical spaces, and institutional embedding. Our findings highlight the importance of designing for “freedom within structure,” recognising learning surprises, and enabling reciprocal partnerships to strengthen TLE impact. The conclusion stresses that while TLEs hold great promise for transformative education and societal engagement, the concept and practice of co-learning remain underdeveloped. These findings call for more research and practical experimentation into supporting, assessing, and making visible the co-learning processes of all actors involved—students, teachers, and stakeholders alike—as a critical step toward realising the third mission of higher education.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL), Saxion (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.