EVOLUTION, INSTITUTIONALISATION, AND CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CANON IN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION

This paper presents an essayistic and conceptual study of investment theory as a century-old educational canon, examined in digital transformation and the era of artificial intelligence. It traces the formation and institutionalization of this canon through key conceptual foundations and organizational actors. The article explores how this canon is reproduced through textbooks, university curricula, and certification structures. The study highlights several structural limitations and methodological deficiencies, including the preferential treatment of fundamental analysis over technical analysis, the marginalization of alternative risk measures, and the critique of the statistical foundations of investment theory. It underscores the need to reconsider investment education's conceptual and pedagogical scope through more adaptive, interdisciplinary, and technologically aware approaches that reflect the realities of contemporary financial markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogue
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58861/tae.di.2025.4.02
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVOLUTION, INSTITUTIONALISATION, AND CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CANON IN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION

Nigokhos Krikorov Kanaryan
Dialogue
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

EVOLUTION, INSTITUTIONALISATION, AND CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CANON IN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION

Nigokhos Krikorov Kanaryan
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an essayistic and conceptual study of investment theory as a century-old educational canon, examined in digital transformation and the era of artificial intelligence. It traces the formation and institutionalization of this canon through key conceptual foundations and organizational actors. The article explores how this canon is reproduced through textbooks, university curricula, and certification structures. The study highlights several structural limitations and methodological deficiencies, including the preferential treatment of fundamental analysis over technical analysis, the marginalization of alternative risk measures, and the critique of the statistical foundations of investment theory. It underscores the need to reconsider investment education's conceptual and pedagogical scope through more adaptive, interdisciplinary, and technologically aware approaches that reflect the realities of contemporary financial markets.

DialogueVol. 24(4)
New Bulgarian University (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EVOLUTION, INSTITUTIONALISATION, AND CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CANON IN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION — Nigokhos Krikorov Kanaryan · Dialogue (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS