Mapping the rights‐implementation gap in Forest Landscape Restoration: evidence from Mexico

Abstract Introduction The inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) in Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) is central to international agendas. Yet, the understanding of how national frameworks operationalize this principle through concrete mechanisms for IPLC participation and rights recognition remains limited. Mexico exemplifies this issue: despite 60% of forests under community management and commitments to restore 8.4 million hectares by 2030, very few restoration projects report meaningful community involvement. Objectives This study determines: (1) the extent to which existing policies align with core FLR principles; (2) how these policies incorporate mechanisms for meaningful IPLC inclusion and rights recognition; and (3) what barriers and opportunities constrain or facilitate policy translation into practice. Methods We assessed 24 Mexican policies (1988–2024) using two complementary indices: an FLR alignment index measuring adherence to eight core restoration principles, and an IPLC inclusion index ranging from exclusion to full autonomy in decision‐making. We followed these with a thematic analysis of policy content to identify barriers and opportunities constraining or facilitating policy‐to‐practice translation. Results Policies demonstrated strong alignment with FLR principles: landscape focus, ecological functionality, multiple benefits, and local adaptation. However, although all policies recognized stakeholder involvement in principle, IPLC inclusion in decision‐making remained severely constrained: only four documents positioned IPLCs as equal collaborators, one granted community leadership, and one provided full autonomy. Conclusions Mexican restoration policy recognizes FLR principles but lacks institutional mechanisms to operationalize meaningful IPLC participation. This gap between international standards and national implementation reflects deeper institutional and governance constraints, underscoring the need for structural changes for equitable and effective restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70351
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the rights‐implementation gap in Forest Landscape Restoration: evidence from Mexico

Tim Foster, Johan A. Oldekop, Rose Pritchard, Mariana Hernandez‐Montilla
Restoration Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Mapping the rights‐implementation gap in Forest Landscape Restoration: evidence from Mexico

Tim Foster, Johan A. Oldekop, Rose Pritchard, Mariana Hernandez‐Montilla
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) in Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) is central to international agendas. Yet, the understanding of how national frameworks operationalize this principle through concrete mechanisms for IPLC participation and rights recognition remains limited. Mexico exemplifies this issue: despite 60% of forests under community management and commitments to restore 8.4 million hectares by 2030, very few restoration projects report meaningful community involvement. Objectives This study determines: (1) the extent to which existing policies align with core FLR principles; (2) how these policies incorporate mechanisms for meaningful IPLC inclusion and rights recognition; and (3) what barriers and opportunities constrain or facilitate policy translation into practice. Methods We assessed 24 Mexican policies (1988–2024) using two complementary indices: an FLR alignment index measuring adherence to eight core restoration principles, and an IPLC inclusion index ranging from exclusion to full autonomy in decision‐making. We followed these with a thematic analysis of policy content to identify barriers and opportunities constraining or facilitating policy‐to‐practice translation. Results Policies demonstrated strong alignment with FLR principles: landscape focus, ecological functionality, multiple benefits, and local adaptation. However, although all policies recognized stakeholder involvement in principle, IPLC inclusion in decision‐making remained severely constrained: only four documents positioned IPLCs as equal collaborators, one granted community leadership, and one provided full autonomy. Conclusions Mexican restoration policy recognizes FLR principles but lacks institutional mechanisms to operationalize meaningful IPLC participation. This gap between international standards and national implementation reflects deeper institutional and governance constraints, underscoring the need for structural changes for equitable and effective restoration.

Restoration Ecology
Center for Global Development (US), University of Manchester (GB), Space Research Institute (UA)
UK Research and Innovation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.