Application of Variance Analysis to Measure the Impact of STEM Methodology Components in an Educational Intervention

This study presents the application of variance analysis (ANOVA) to evaluate the effectiveness of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) methodology in an educational intervention. The primary objective was to measure the learning impact per session and assess the influence of three key components: preparation time, teacher performance, and social interaction. The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the average learning rate per session, suggesting a consistent learning outcome above 75% throughout the intervention. However, notable differences emerged when examining the influence of specific components. Regarding preparation time, courses with extensive preparation achieved an average learning rate of 94.5%, in contrast to only 13.64% for sessions with immediate preparation. In terms of teacher performance, instructors who exceeded teaching expectations reached an average learning rate of 92.74%, while those demonstrating deficiencies resulted in only 11.25%. Finally, classrooms characterized by dynamic social interaction reported a 95.14% learning rate, compared to just 10.19% under minimal interaction conditions. These findings emphasize that the effectiveness of STEM methodology is significantly enhanced when supported by thorough preparation, high teaching quality, and active classroom engagement. The study highlights the value of pedagogical planning and collaborative learning environments in optimizing STEM-based education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CLEI electronic journal
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19153/cleiej.29.1.5
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Variance Analysis to Measure the Impact of STEM Methodology Components in an Educational Intervention

Jean Vanderdonckt, Josefina Guerrero García, Alfredo Garcia Suárez
CLEI electronic journal
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Application of Variance Analysis to Measure the Impact of STEM Methodology Components in an Educational Intervention

Jean Vanderdonckt, Josefina Guerrero García, Alfredo Garcia Suárez
article en

Abstract

This study presents the application of variance analysis (ANOVA) to evaluate the effectiveness of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) methodology in an educational intervention. The primary objective was to measure the learning impact per session and assess the influence of three key components: preparation time, teacher performance, and social interaction. The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the average learning rate per session, suggesting a consistent learning outcome above 75% throughout the intervention. However, notable differences emerged when examining the influence of specific components. Regarding preparation time, courses with extensive preparation achieved an average learning rate of 94.5%, in contrast to only 13.64% for sessions with immediate preparation. In terms of teacher performance, instructors who exceeded teaching expectations reached an average learning rate of 92.74%, while those demonstrating deficiencies resulted in only 11.25%. Finally, classrooms characterized by dynamic social interaction reported a 95.14% learning rate, compared to just 10.19% under minimal interaction conditions. These findings emphasize that the effectiveness of STEM methodology is significantly enhanced when supported by thorough preparation, high teaching quality, and active classroom engagement. The study highlights the value of pedagogical planning and collaborative learning environments in optimizing STEM-based education.

CLEI electronic journalVol. 29(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.