What factors determine the pore growth rate of porous anodic alumina?

The formation mechanism of porous anodic alumina has traditionally been attributed to field-assisted dissolution (FAD), a theory necessitating a dynamic equilibrium between electrochemical oxide growth and FAD. However, direct experimental verification of dissolution rates matching pore growth rates remains elusive. This study quantitatively decouples the contribution of corrosive dissolution from pore propagation kinetics by anodizing aluminum in phosphoric acid electrolytes (1-4 wt%) modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Crucially, the experimental results contradict the fundamental prediction of FAD theory: the addition of 50 wt% PEG unexpectedly accelerated the pore growth rate from 152 nm min<sup>-1</sup>(in pure aqueous solution) to 250 nm min<sup>-1</sup>, despite significantly reducing the electrolyte's corrosive power. Furthermore, immersion tests without electric field reveal a maximum chemical corrosion rate of only ∼2.73 nm min<sup>-1</sup>at up to 60 °C, representing a two-order-of-magnitude discrepancy compared to the 300 nm min<sup>-1</sup>growth rate required by FAD models. These findings demonstrate that chemical corrosion is kinetically insufficient to drive rapid pore channel extension. Consequently, this work challenges the validity of the FAD theory and provides robust evidence supporting the oxygen bubble model, wherein pore growth is governed by the plastic flow of barrier oxide around oxygen gas molds generated by electronic current.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nanotechnology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ae4109
Primary Topic
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What factors determine the pore growth rate of porous anodic alumina?

Ye SONG, Guangze Xu, Pengze Li, Shuangze Wang et al.
Nanotechnology
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
article

What factors determine the pore growth rate of porous anodic alumina?

Ye SONG, Guangze Xu, Pengze Li, Shuangze Wang, Jiahao Wang, Chenfei Lv, Peng Qian
article en

Abstract

The formation mechanism of porous anodic alumina has traditionally been attributed to field-assisted dissolution (FAD), a theory necessitating a dynamic equilibrium between electrochemical oxide growth and FAD. However, direct experimental verification of dissolution rates matching pore growth rates remains elusive. This study quantitatively decouples the contribution of corrosive dissolution from pore propagation kinetics by anodizing aluminum in phosphoric acid electrolytes (1-4 wt%) modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Crucially, the experimental results contradict the fundamental prediction of FAD theory: the addition of 50 wt% PEG unexpectedly accelerated the pore growth rate from 152 nm min<sup>-1</sup>(in pure aqueous solution) to 250 nm min<sup>-1</sup>, despite significantly reducing the electrolyte's corrosive power. Furthermore, immersion tests without electric field reveal a maximum chemical corrosion rate of only ∼2.73 nm min<sup>-1</sup>at up to 60 °C, representing a two-order-of-magnitude discrepancy compared to the 300 nm min<sup>-1</sup>growth rate required by FAD models. These findings demonstrate that chemical corrosion is kinetically insufficient to drive rapid pore channel extension. Consequently, this work challenges the validity of the FAD theory and provides robust evidence supporting the oxygen bubble model, wherein pore growth is governed by the plastic flow of barrier oxide around oxygen gas molds generated by electronic current.

NanotechnologyVol. 37(6)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Ministry of Education (TW), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What factors determine the pore growth rate of porous anodic alumina? — Ye SONG, Guangze Xu, et al. · Nanotechnology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS