Structural ontogeny of protein-protein interactions

Understanding how protein binding sites evolve interactions with other proteins could hold clues to targeting "undruggable" surfaces. We used synthetic coevolution to engineer new interactions between naïve surfaces, simulating the de novo formation of protein complexes. We isolated seven distinct structural families of protein Z-domain complexes and found that synthetic complexes explore multiple shallow energy wells through ratchet-like docking modes, whereas complexes formed by natural binding sites converged in a deep energy well with a relatively fixed geometry. Epistasis analysis of a machine learning-estimated fitness landscape revealed "seed" contacts between binding partners that anchored the earliest stages of encounter complex formation. Our results suggest that "silent" surfaces have a shallower energy landscape than natural binding sites, disfavoring tight binding, likely owing to evolutionary counterselection.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx6931
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural ontogeny of protein-protein interactions

1 citations
Science
Protein Structure and Dynamics
22.24
article

Structural ontogeny of protein-protein interactions

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding how protein binding sites evolve interactions with other proteins could hold clues to targeting "undruggable" surfaces. We used synthetic coevolution to engineer new interactions between naïve surfaces, simulating the de novo formation of protein complexes. We isolated seven distinct structural families of protein Z-domain complexes and found that synthetic complexes explore multiple shallow energy wells through ratchet-like docking modes, whereas complexes formed by natural binding sites converged in a deep energy well with a relatively fixed geometry. Epistasis analysis of a machine learning-estimated fitness landscape revealed "seed" contacts between binding partners that anchored the earliest stages of encounter complex formation. Our results suggest that "silent" surfaces have a shallower energy landscape than natural binding sites, disfavoring tight binding, likely owing to evolutionary counterselection.

ScienceVol. 391(6786)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Quantitative BioSciences (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
22.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.