Sex Differences in Myocardial Injury: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Prognostic Implications

<b>Background</b>: Myocardial injury is a known predictor of adverse outcomes. However, the impact of sex on its presentation, management, and prognosis is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to examine these differences in a tertiary hospital setting. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive emergency department patients undergoing troponin testing from January 2012 to December 2013. Myocardial injury was classified as type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), type 2 myocardial infarction, or non-ischemic myocardial injury (NIMI). Clinical characteristics, management, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared by sex over a median follow-up of four years. Interaction analyses were performed to assess whether the effect of myocardial injury on outcomes differed between men and women. <b>Results</b>: Among 3620 patients, myocardial injury was more prevalent in men (31.4% vs. 25.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with male sex independently associated with myocardial injury (odds ratio 1.32; 95% CI 1.11-1.58; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Risk factor profiles and electrocardiographic findings differed between sexes. NIMI was more common in women, while T1MI predominated in men (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Women with myocardial injury were less frequently hospitalized than men (63.1% vs. 74.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, long-term mortality was slightly higher in men (HR 3.39; 95% CI 2.73-4.21; <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas women had higher adjusted risks of myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 4.11; 95% CI 2.35-7.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and heart failure (HF) (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.25-2.55; <i>p</i> = 0.002). No significant interaction between sex and myocardial injury was observed for any outcome. <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant sex differences exist in myocardial injury type and prognosis. Women face increased risk of future MI and HF, whereas men have higher mortality risk. The effect of myocardial injury on long-term outcomes appears similar in both sexes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041439
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Myocardial Injury: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Prognostic Implications

Óscar M. Peiró, Mar Rocamora-Horrach, A. Carrasquer, German Andres Ortega Cediel et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Sex Differences in Myocardial Injury: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Prognostic Implications

Óscar M. Peiró, Mar Rocamora-Horrach, A. Carrasquer, German Andres Ortega Cediel, Isabel Murillo Fort, Alfredo Bardají, José Luis Ferreiro
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Myocardial injury is a known predictor of adverse outcomes. However, the impact of sex on its presentation, management, and prognosis is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to examine these differences in a tertiary hospital setting. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive emergency department patients undergoing troponin testing from January 2012 to December 2013. Myocardial injury was classified as type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), type 2 myocardial infarction, or non-ischemic myocardial injury (NIMI). Clinical characteristics, management, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared by sex over a median follow-up of four years. Interaction analyses were performed to assess whether the effect of myocardial injury on outcomes differed between men and women. <b>Results</b>: Among 3620 patients, myocardial injury was more prevalent in men (31.4% vs. 25.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with male sex independently associated with myocardial injury (odds ratio 1.32; 95% CI 1.11-1.58; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Risk factor profiles and electrocardiographic findings differed between sexes. NIMI was more common in women, while T1MI predominated in men (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Women with myocardial injury were less frequently hospitalized than men (63.1% vs. 74.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, long-term mortality was slightly higher in men (HR 3.39; 95% CI 2.73-4.21; <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas women had higher adjusted risks of myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 4.11; 95% CI 2.35-7.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and heart failure (HF) (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.25-2.55; <i>p</i> = 0.002). No significant interaction between sex and myocardial injury was observed for any outcome. <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant sex differences exist in myocardial injury type and prognosis. Women face increased risk of future MI and HF, whereas men have higher mortality risk. The effect of myocardial injury on long-term outcomes appears similar in both sexes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
Observatori de l'Ebre (ES), Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona (ES), Institut Català d'Arqueologia Clàssica (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.