Dynamic modeling of lithium-ion battery degradation using data-driven and physics-informed method

Accurate real‑time prediction of lithium‑ion battery (LIB) capacity degradation is essential for embedded battery‑management systems. Equivalent circuit models (ECMs) run quickly but lose accuracy over time, whereas purely data-driven networks achieve high precision at a high computational cost. This study introduces a physics‑informed neural network (PINN) that embeds the differential equations of a first‑order Thevenin ECM directly into the loss function. Using only terminal voltage and current as inputs, the network simultaneously estimates internal resistance, polarization resistance, polarization capacitance, open‑circuit voltage, and capacity loss. The model was trained and evaluated over 300 charge–discharge cycles of a 18650 lithium-ferrous phosphate (LFP) cell. The resulting capacity degradation estimation achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.012 and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.974 %, surpassing a neural ordinary differential equation baseline with RMSE of 0.215. The trained network contains 261 parameters, requires 0.6 ms per sample for inference, and consumes 49 MB of memory. This computation cost is far lower than that of a long short‑term memory (LSTM) benchmark with comparable accuracy. In addition, the proposed model maintains its accuracy under limited dataset conditions. With a fourfold smaller training set, the PINN maintained an RMSE of 0.023, whereas the LSTM error increased to 0.72. The results demonstrate that lightweight neural networks guided by physics-based constraints can provide reliable, real-time health estimation on resource‑limited hardware.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SINERGI
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2026.1.013
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic modeling of lithium-ion battery degradation using data-driven and physics-informed method

Muhamad Dzaky Ashidqi, Daniel Santoso
SINERGI
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Dynamic modeling of lithium-ion battery degradation using data-driven and physics-informed method

Muhamad Dzaky Ashidqi, Daniel Santoso
article en

Abstract

Accurate real‑time prediction of lithium‑ion battery (LIB) capacity degradation is essential for embedded battery‑management systems. Equivalent circuit models (ECMs) run quickly but lose accuracy over time, whereas purely data-driven networks achieve high precision at a high computational cost. This study introduces a physics‑informed neural network (PINN) that embeds the differential equations of a first‑order Thevenin ECM directly into the loss function. Using only terminal voltage and current as inputs, the network simultaneously estimates internal resistance, polarization resistance, polarization capacitance, open‑circuit voltage, and capacity loss. The model was trained and evaluated over 300 charge–discharge cycles of a 18650 lithium-ferrous phosphate (LFP) cell. The resulting capacity degradation estimation achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.012 and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.974 %, surpassing a neural ordinary differential equation baseline with RMSE of 0.215. The trained network contains 261 parameters, requires 0.6 ms per sample for inference, and consumes 49 MB of memory. This computation cost is far lower than that of a long short‑term memory (LSTM) benchmark with comparable accuracy. In addition, the proposed model maintains its accuracy under limited dataset conditions. With a fourfold smaller training set, the PINN maintained an RMSE of 0.023, whereas the LSTM error increased to 0.72. The results demonstrate that lightweight neural networks guided by physics-based constraints can provide reliable, real-time health estimation on resource‑limited hardware.

SINERGIVol. 30(1)
Satya Wacana Christian University (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.