Friends, the Internet, Porn, and Sexual Partners: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Ways That Gay Men Learned About Sex

Sexual education in the United States is rich and complex, yet it has centered heterosexual sexual practices with parents and schools playing a critical, and often judgmental role. This study aimed to explore the different ways that gay men learned about their sexual orientation and sexual behaviors, outside the traditional mechanisms. Data from N = 19 one-on-one interviews were analyzed using the iterative procedures associated with inductive qualitative content analysis. Findings showed the use of four major (discussions with friends, internet use, viewing pornography, and conversations with sexual partners), and four minor (viewing media, talking to professionals, discussions with trusted family members, and conversations with social acquaintances) learning mechanisms that helped them learn in detail about their sexual orientation, and sexual behaviors. These mechanisms occurred in two frameworks (in-person and digital media). Ultimately, these avenues facilitated opportunities for open, honest, uninhibited, and judgement free discussions and learning about sexual orientation and sexual behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Men s Studies
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265261427183
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Friends, the Internet, Porn, and Sexual Partners: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Ways That Gay Men Learned About Sex

Junior Lloyd Allen, Micah Mitchell, Shani Saxon, D.P. Boyd et al.
The Journal of Men s Studies
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Friends, the Internet, Porn, and Sexual Partners: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Ways That Gay Men Learned About Sex

Junior Lloyd Allen, Micah Mitchell, Shani Saxon, D.P. Boyd, Keshaum Houston, Antonio T. Williams, AeYanna L. Yett, Camille R. Quinn, Colby Tarrh
article en

Abstract

Sexual education in the United States is rich and complex, yet it has centered heterosexual sexual practices with parents and schools playing a critical, and often judgmental role. This study aimed to explore the different ways that gay men learned about their sexual orientation and sexual behaviors, outside the traditional mechanisms. Data from N = 19 one-on-one interviews were analyzed using the iterative procedures associated with inductive qualitative content analysis. Findings showed the use of four major (discussions with friends, internet use, viewing pornography, and conversations with sexual partners), and four minor (viewing media, talking to professionals, discussions with trusted family members, and conversations with social acquaintances) learning mechanisms that helped them learn in detail about their sexual orientation, and sexual behaviors. These mechanisms occurred in two frameworks (in-person and digital media). Ultimately, these avenues facilitated opportunities for open, honest, uninhibited, and judgement free discussions and learning about sexual orientation and sexual behaviors.

The Journal of Men s Studies
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Wayne State University (US), University of Michigan (US), Yale University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Morgan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.