The Ethics and Politics of New Brutalism in Education: Infrastructures, Affects, and Insurgent Possibilities

This paper explores the emergence of new brutalism in education as a political, infrastructural, and affective formation that normalizes hardness and domination. Drawing on Achille Mbembe’s (2024) notion of political brutalism and Michael Truscello's (2020) theorization of infrastructural brutalism, the paper examines how contemporary regimes of governance reconfigure education through violence—epistemic, material, and affective. Two examples—Trump 2.0’s renewed assault on higher education in the United States and Taliban 2.0’s repression of women’s and girls’ education in Afghanistan—illustrate how brutalism functions globally as a mode of affective and ideological control. The analysis advances a vision of anti-brutalist insurgency: an ethical and pedagogical orientation that transforms exposure into solidarity through micro-practices of care, repair, and endurance. The paper concludes by reflecting on what it means to educate ethically in brutal times, nurturing care without denying hardness and reimagining education as a site of collective repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-026-10039-6
Primary Topic
Peace and Human Rights Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics and Politics of New Brutalism in Education: Infrastructures, Affects, and Insurgent Possibilities

Michalinos Zembylas
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Peace and Human Rights Education
article

The Ethics and Politics of New Brutalism in Education: Infrastructures, Affects, and Insurgent Possibilities

Michalinos Zembylas
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the emergence of new brutalism in education as a political, infrastructural, and affective formation that normalizes hardness and domination. Drawing on Achille Mbembe’s (2024) notion of political brutalism and Michael Truscello's (2020) theorization of infrastructural brutalism, the paper examines how contemporary regimes of governance reconfigure education through violence—epistemic, material, and affective. Two examples—Trump 2.0’s renewed assault on higher education in the United States and Taliban 2.0’s repression of women’s and girls’ education in Afghanistan—illustrate how brutalism functions globally as a mode of affective and ideological control. The analysis advances a vision of anti-brutalist insurgency: an ethical and pedagogical orientation that transforms exposure into solidarity through micro-practices of care, repair, and endurance. The paper concludes by reflecting on what it means to educate ethically in brutal times, nurturing care without denying hardness and reimagining education as a site of collective repair.

Studies in Philosophy and Education
Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Peace and Human Rights Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ethics and Politics of New Brutalism in Education: Infrastructures, Affects, and Insurgent Possibilities — Michalinos Zembylas · Studies in Philosophy and Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS