Neology in practice

The COST Action ‘European Network on Lexical Innovation’ (ENEOLI) has conducted a comprehensive survey in October-November 2024 regarding the methods, practices, tools, and resources used in the study and documentation of lexical innovations, including neologisms and novel senses. The 249 respondents from 50 countries represented linguists, lexicographers, terminologists, translators, software developers, and educators. Respondents could indicate more than one field of expertise, and 169 noted theirs as linguistics (70%), 107 lexicography (44%) and 105 terminology (43%). In this paper, we focus on the responses of those indicating their field of expertise as lexicography and/or terminology, and we analyzed their approaches to the identification and documentation of neologisms, the composition of project teams and the use of corpora and digital tools. Special attention is given to training pathways and professional needs, offering insights into the evolving skills required in the field of lexical innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2026-02-09
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neology in practice

Kris Heylen, Federica Vezzani, Kristina Koppel, Ilan Kernerman et al.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Neology in practice

Kris Heylen, Federica Vezzani, Kristina Koppel, Ilan Kernerman, Ana Ostroški Anić, Jelena Kallas, Špela Arhar Holdt
article en

Abstract

The COST Action ‘European Network on Lexical Innovation’ (ENEOLI) has conducted a comprehensive survey in October-November 2024 regarding the methods, practices, tools, and resources used in the study and documentation of lexical innovations, including neologisms and novel senses. The 249 respondents from 50 countries represented linguists, lexicographers, terminologists, translators, software developers, and educators. Respondents could indicate more than one field of expertise, and 169 noted theirs as linguistics (70%), 107 lexicography (44%) and 105 terminology (43%). In this paper, we focus on the responses of those indicating their field of expertise as lexicography and/or terminology, and we analyzed their approaches to the identification and documentation of neologisms, the composition of project teams and the use of corpora and digital tools. Special attention is given to training pathways and professional needs, offering insights into the evolving skills required in the field of lexical innovation.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.