AI Scribe Use in Residency Training: A Call for Specialty Society Guidance in Graduate Medical Education

Julia A Giordano,1 Elizabeth Jones2 1Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USACorrespondence: Elizabeth Jones, Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 33 South 9th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA, Tel +1570-573-1745, Email [email protected]: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for documentation purposes in clinical practice, yet guidance for resident use is limited. Given the substantial documentation burden on medical trainees, AI-powered scribing tools may offer benefits, but their integration into residency training raises educational, supervisory, and patient safety considerations. This study aimed to assess the availability of resident-specific guidance on AI scribe use from major medical and specialty organizations and to summarize current evidence on AI scribes in residency. We reviewed five major medical and specialty society websites (AAD, AMA, ACGME, AAMC, ABMS) via website searches and direct emails and conducted a PubMed search for residency-focused studies. No organization provided resident-specific guidelines; the AMA noted the need for safe, accurate, and non-discriminatory AI use, and the AAMC issued general principles for the use of AI in medical education, none of which specifically address resident documentation. Literature review identified two studies evaluating AI-assisted documentation in the residency context. The studies suggest reduced documentation burden and cognitive load, with documentation quality comparable to resident physicians. These findings highlight the need for residency-specific AI scribe consensus guidelines that address resident review, note sign-off, accountability, patient consent, and scope of use to ensure safe and effective integration into training.Keywords: artificial intelligence, medical documentation, ambient scribing, graduate medical education, residency training, documentation burden, patient safety

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2026-02-01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Scribe Use in Residency Training: A Call for Specialty Society Guidance in Graduate Medical Education

Giordano JA, Jones E
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI Scribe Use in Residency Training: A Call for Specialty Society Guidance in Graduate Medical Education

Giordano JA, Jones E
article en

Abstract

Julia A Giordano,1 Elizabeth Jones2 1Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USACorrespondence: Elizabeth Jones, Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 33 South 9th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA, Tel +1570-573-1745, Email [email protected]: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for documentation purposes in clinical practice, yet guidance for resident use is limited. Given the substantial documentation burden on medical trainees, AI-powered scribing tools may offer benefits, but their integration into residency training raises educational, supervisory, and patient safety considerations. This study aimed to assess the availability of resident-specific guidance on AI scribe use from major medical and specialty organizations and to summarize current evidence on AI scribes in residency. We reviewed five major medical and specialty society websites (AAD, AMA, ACGME, AAMC, ABMS) via website searches and direct emails and conducted a PubMed search for residency-focused studies. No organization provided resident-specific guidelines; the AMA noted the need for safe, accurate, and non-discriminatory AI use, and the AAMC issued general principles for the use of AI in medical education, none of which specifically address resident documentation. Literature review identified two studies evaluating AI-assisted documentation in the residency context. The studies suggest reduced documentation burden and cognitive load, with documentation quality comparable to resident physicians. These findings highlight the need for residency-specific AI scribe consensus guidelines that address resident review, note sign-off, accountability, patient consent, and scope of use to ensure safe and effective integration into training.Keywords: artificial intelligence, medical documentation, ambient scribing, graduate medical education, residency training, documentation burden, patient safety

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Scribe Use in Residency Training: A Call for Specialty Society Guidance in Graduate Medical Education — Giordano JA, Jones E · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS