Voluntary relinquishment: Moralities and hierarchization of rights in legal-legislative initiatives in Brazil

We examine the legal and legislative initiatives concerning the relinquishment of children for adoption currently being implemented in Brazil. Voluntary Relinquishment is a right guaranteed to pregnant individuals under Law 13.509/2017. Our analysis focuses on State-sponsored efforts to promote this practice, particularly state and municipal laws mandating informational signage in healthcare settings, as well as programs and campaigns spearheaded by the Judiciary. These initiatives generate moral regimes grounded in representations of ‘dangerous’ or ‘abandoning’ mothers, abortion, and infanticide, which are used to justify and intensify the regulation of motherhood. We link this process to a new pedagogy of family institutions as a State policy, one that prioritizes the relinquishment of children for adoption and enacts a specific hierarchy of rights between children and women (or gestating persons). The emphasis on child protection policy ultimately overrides reproductive rights and eclipses the broader, revitalized debate on reproductive justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OpenEdition (OpenEdition)
Published
2026-02-09
Primary Topic
Male Reproductive Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voluntary relinquishment: Moralities and hierarchization of rights in legal-legislative initiatives in Brazil

Hevelyn Rosa, Denise Clemente da Silva, Cristiane da Silva Cabral
OpenEdition (OpenEdition)
Male Reproductive Health Studies
article

Voluntary relinquishment: Moralities and hierarchization of rights in legal-legislative initiatives in Brazil

Hevelyn Rosa, Denise Clemente da Silva, Cristiane da Silva Cabral
article en

Abstract

We examine the legal and legislative initiatives concerning the relinquishment of children for adoption currently being implemented in Brazil. Voluntary Relinquishment is a right guaranteed to pregnant individuals under Law 13.509/2017. Our analysis focuses on State-sponsored efforts to promote this practice, particularly state and municipal laws mandating informational signage in healthcare settings, as well as programs and campaigns spearheaded by the Judiciary. These initiatives generate moral regimes grounded in representations of ‘dangerous’ or ‘abandoning’ mothers, abortion, and infanticide, which are used to justify and intensify the regulation of motherhood. We link this process to a new pedagogy of family institutions as a State policy, one that prioritizes the relinquishment of children for adoption and enacts a specific hierarchy of rights between children and women (or gestating persons). The emphasis on child protection policy ultimately overrides reproductive rights and eclipses the broader, revitalized debate on reproductive justice.

OpenEdition (OpenEdition)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Male Reproductive Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.