Perpetual Infidel Aliens?

In 1655, Oliver Cromwell’s government refused Jews the freedom to establish a Jewish judicial system. Instead, Jews were to be granted the ‘condition of strangers’ that permitted some non-native-born subjects to sue in the king’s courts. However, a potentially fatal litigation hurdle entitled defendants to argue that Jews were perpetual alien infidels who, according to Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case (1608), could never litigate in the king’s courts. This article examines how legal rhetoric based on imaginary Jews was disavowed by mid-to-late eighteenth century English courts because of several factors – an emerging expansionist commercial empire, natural law principles and the presence of real Jews as litigants in the courts and in English society – which led courts to re-evaluate banning litigants from the courts based on their religious belief.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
publish.UP (University of Potsdam)
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-68897
Primary Topic
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perpetual Infidel Aliens?

Wendy Filer
publish.UP (University of Potsdam)
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
article

Perpetual Infidel Aliens?

Wendy Filer
article en

Abstract

In 1655, Oliver Cromwell’s government refused Jews the freedom to establish a Jewish judicial system. Instead, Jews were to be granted the ‘condition of strangers’ that permitted some non-native-born subjects to sue in the king’s courts. However, a potentially fatal litigation hurdle entitled defendants to argue that Jews were perpetual alien infidels who, according to Lord Coke in Calvin’s Case (1608), could never litigate in the king’s courts. This article examines how legal rhetoric based on imaginary Jews was disavowed by mid-to-late eighteenth century English courts because of several factors – an emerging expansionist commercial empire, natural law principles and the presence of real Jews as litigants in the courts and in English society – which led courts to re-evaluate banning litigants from the courts based on their religious belief.

publish.UP (University of Potsdam)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.