Valuing Sustainability: A Literature Review of True Cost Accounting for Food Systems

This report provides a comprehensive review of True Cost Accounting (TCA), conceptualised as an evolving holistic and systemic approach to measure and value the positive and negative environmental, social, health, and economic costs and benefits associated with agrifood systems. Grounded in welfare economics and environmental and ecological valuation, the report traces the intellectual foundations of TCA and clarifies its distinction from related approaches. It develops a functional taxonomy of TCA applications across product, business, and policy or regional scales, mapping actor-specific roles and decision levers from farmers and firms to regulators and civil society. The report outlines a four-step methodological process consisting of Framing and Scoping, Measurement and Valuation, Integration and Interpretation, and Application, and synthesises a pluralistic toolbox of impact assessment and valuation methods, including Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment, shadow pricing, damage-cost approaches, contingent valuation, choice experiments, hedonic pricing, travel-cost and replacement-cost methods, and multi-criteria decision analysis. In addition, the report examines the data ecosystems required to operationalise TCA, discussing the complementarities and trade-offs between primary and secondary data, qualitative and quantitative sources, and the importance of interoperability and transparent metadata standards. It critically reflects on practical and epistemological limitations, including data gaps, lack of harmonised indicators and terminology, modelling complexity, and normative assumptions. The report concludes with five recommendations to strengthen TCA as a robust and equitable accounting standard, focusing on improved data quality and transparency, clearer scope and baselines, methodological harmonisation, dynamic modelling, and enhanced valuation practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lirias (KU Leuven)
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18605996
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuing Sustainability: A Literature Review of True Cost Accounting for Food Systems

Erik Mathijs, Michele Moretti, Erika De Keyser, Molla Tigabu Kasaw et al.
Lirias (KU Leuven)
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

Valuing Sustainability: A Literature Review of True Cost Accounting for Food Systems

Erik Mathijs, Michele Moretti, Erika De Keyser, Molla Tigabu Kasaw, Henri Contor
article en

Abstract

This report provides a comprehensive review of True Cost Accounting (TCA), conceptualised as an evolving holistic and systemic approach to measure and value the positive and negative environmental, social, health, and economic costs and benefits associated with agrifood systems. Grounded in welfare economics and environmental and ecological valuation, the report traces the intellectual foundations of TCA and clarifies its distinction from related approaches. It develops a functional taxonomy of TCA applications across product, business, and policy or regional scales, mapping actor-specific roles and decision levers from farmers and firms to regulators and civil society. The report outlines a four-step methodological process consisting of Framing and Scoping, Measurement and Valuation, Integration and Interpretation, and Application, and synthesises a pluralistic toolbox of impact assessment and valuation methods, including Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment, shadow pricing, damage-cost approaches, contingent valuation, choice experiments, hedonic pricing, travel-cost and replacement-cost methods, and multi-criteria decision analysis. In addition, the report examines the data ecosystems required to operationalise TCA, discussing the complementarities and trade-offs between primary and secondary data, qualitative and quantitative sources, and the importance of interoperability and transparent metadata standards. It critically reflects on practical and epistemological limitations, including data gaps, lack of harmonised indicators and terminology, modelling complexity, and normative assumptions. The report concludes with five recommendations to strengthen TCA as a robust and equitable accounting standard, focusing on improved data quality and transparency, clearer scope and baselines, methodological harmonisation, dynamic modelling, and enhanced valuation practices.

Lirias (KU Leuven)
University of Pisa (IT), Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.