Overcoming Legislative and Institutional Barriers to Implementing Methadone Dispensing in a California Health System

ABSTRACT Background Opioid overdose deaths increased markedly during the COVID‐19 pandemic, highlighting the need to optimize access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Hospitalization presents a key opportunity to initiate treatment. However, methadone access is uniquely limited by federal and state regulations requiring dispensing through Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs). This frequently delays hospital discharge, prolongs inpatient length of stay, or necessitates return emergency department (ED) visits when OTPs are inaccessible. In March 2022, the Drug Enforcement Administration permitted hospitals to dispense up to a 72‐h supply of methadone for OUD while arranging OTP care, but unclear state‐level authorization limited adoption in our California hospital. Methods We describe the multidisciplinary process of implementing hospital‐based methadone dispensing under the federal 72‐h rule at a California acute care hospital. This included legislative advocacy culminating in passage of Assembly Bill 2115, regulatory and legal review, Board of Pharmacy engagement, development of electronic medical record workflows, pharmacy operations redesign, and anti‐stigma education. We also evaluated baseline utilization and costs associated with delayed discharges and ED return visits related to methadone access and reported early post‐implementation outcomes. Results Prior to implementation, methadone‐related barriers accounted for 33 excess inpatient days and 15 ED visits in a 7‐month period, with an estimated cost of $415 970 annually. In the first 8 months after implementation, 25 patients received dispensed methadone, avoiding at least 40 inpatient days and 12 ED visits, with estimated cost savings of $269 164. Nine patients were newly initiated on methadone during hospitalization. Conclusions Hospital‐based methadone dispensing under the 72‐h rule is feasible, legally permissible in California following AB 2115, and associated with reductions in length of stay, ED utilization, and healthcare costs. This program improves continuity of care, reduces stigma, and expands access to lifesaving MOUD, offering a framework for other institutions and states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overcoming Legislative and Institutional Barriers to Implementing Methadone Dispensing in a California Health System

David S Dakwa, Aimee Moulin, Daniel Nguyen, José R. López et al.
1 citations
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
41.85
article

Overcoming Legislative and Institutional Barriers to Implementing Methadone Dispensing in a California Health System

David S Dakwa, Aimee Moulin, Daniel Nguyen, José R. López, Cara S Eberhardt, Sarah Cummins, Roy Weng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Opioid overdose deaths increased markedly during the COVID‐19 pandemic, highlighting the need to optimize access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Hospitalization presents a key opportunity to initiate treatment. However, methadone access is uniquely limited by federal and state regulations requiring dispensing through Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs). This frequently delays hospital discharge, prolongs inpatient length of stay, or necessitates return emergency department (ED) visits when OTPs are inaccessible. In March 2022, the Drug Enforcement Administration permitted hospitals to dispense up to a 72‐h supply of methadone for OUD while arranging OTP care, but unclear state‐level authorization limited adoption in our California hospital. Methods We describe the multidisciplinary process of implementing hospital‐based methadone dispensing under the federal 72‐h rule at a California acute care hospital. This included legislative advocacy culminating in passage of Assembly Bill 2115, regulatory and legal review, Board of Pharmacy engagement, development of electronic medical record workflows, pharmacy operations redesign, and anti‐stigma education. We also evaluated baseline utilization and costs associated with delayed discharges and ED return visits related to methadone access and reported early post‐implementation outcomes. Results Prior to implementation, methadone‐related barriers accounted for 33 excess inpatient days and 15 ED visits in a 7‐month period, with an estimated cost of $415 970 annually. In the first 8 months after implementation, 25 patients received dispensed methadone, avoiding at least 40 inpatient days and 12 ED visits, with estimated cost savings of $269 164. Nine patients were newly initiated on methadone during hospitalization. Conclusions Hospital‐based methadone dispensing under the 72‐h rule is feasible, legally permissible in California following AB 2115, and associated with reductions in length of stay, ED utilization, and healthcare costs. This program improves continuity of care, reduces stigma, and expands access to lifesaving MOUD, offering a framework for other institutions and states.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 9(3)
University of California, Davis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
41.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.