South Korean Women’s Cinephilia: Comparing the Cinematic Discourses of Parit’ŏ (1989–1991) and the South Korean Alternative Film Movement of the 1980s

Abstract: Parit’ŏ is recognized as a pioneer of the South Korean cine-feminist movement. Initially a social gathering, it evolved into seminars on film theory and feminist film criticism. Members criticized South Korean cinema for marginalizing women and reinforcing male-centric narratives, even in films aimed at female audiences. Parit’ŏ also revealed a dual identity, combining feminist concerns with engagement in the Minjung movement. This becomes clear when comparing its discourse with the alternative cinema movements of the 1980s: Open Cinema for the Minjung, Small Cinema, and Minjok Cinema. Although primarily engaged with cine-feminist theories, Parit’ŏ shared broader critiques against government repression and Chungmuro’s complacency. While Minjok Cinema’s radicalization led to the decline of intellectual cinephile discourse by the late 1980s, Parit’ŏ continued to develop artistic and experimental approaches. However, as South Korean cinema gained cultural legitimacy in the 1990s, cine-feminism struggled to find a place within the new intellectual cinephilia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Communication
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/kjc.00025
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

South Korean Women’s Cinephilia: Comparing the Cinematic Discourses of Parit’ŏ (1989–1991) and the South Korean Alternative Film Movement of the 1980s

Sora Hong
Korean Journal of Communication
Cinema and Media Studies
article

South Korean Women’s Cinephilia: Comparing the Cinematic Discourses of Parit’ŏ (1989–1991) and the South Korean Alternative Film Movement of the 1980s

Sora Hong
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Parit’ŏ is recognized as a pioneer of the South Korean cine-feminist movement. Initially a social gathering, it evolved into seminars on film theory and feminist film criticism. Members criticized South Korean cinema for marginalizing women and reinforcing male-centric narratives, even in films aimed at female audiences. Parit’ŏ also revealed a dual identity, combining feminist concerns with engagement in the Minjung movement. This becomes clear when comparing its discourse with the alternative cinema movements of the 1980s: Open Cinema for the Minjung, Small Cinema, and Minjok Cinema. Although primarily engaged with cine-feminist theories, Parit’ŏ shared broader critiques against government repression and Chungmuro’s complacency. While Minjok Cinema’s radicalization led to the decline of intellectual cinephile discourse by the late 1980s, Parit’ŏ continued to develop artistic and experimental approaches. However, as South Korean cinema gained cultural legitimacy in the 1990s, cine-feminism struggled to find a place within the new intellectual cinephilia.

Korean Journal of CommunicationVol. 2(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.