Predictive and prognostic performance of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is a well-established marker for chronic kidney disease, but its utility in predicting acute kidney injury remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate predictive performance for AKI development and prognostic performance for AKI progression in hospitalized adults. A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases identified 13 studies (n = 10,438) on AKI incidence and three studies (n = 1596) on AKI progression. Elevated UACR was associated with an increased risk of AKI (pooled OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.79) and AKI progression (pooled OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.59-5.45). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AKI prediction were 0.71 (95% CI 0.59-0.80) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.76), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies, and UACR thresholds for AKI prediction varied widely. Despite these limitations, UACR appears to be a promising, low-cost biomarker for predicting AKI, particularly in high-risk settings such as cardiac surgery. Standardization of thresholds and further validation are needed to support its clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37717-2
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive and prognostic performance of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yukiko Hikasa, Jordan Ismail, Alessandro Caroli, Jonathan Nübel et al.
Scientific Reports
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Predictive and prognostic performance of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yukiko Hikasa, Jordan Ismail, Alessandro Caroli, Jonathan Nübel, Nuanprae Kitisin, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Glenn Eastwood, Rinaldo Bellomo, Ary Serpa Neto
article en

Abstract

The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is a well-established marker for chronic kidney disease, but its utility in predicting acute kidney injury remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate predictive performance for AKI development and prognostic performance for AKI progression in hospitalized adults. A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases identified 13 studies (n = 10,438) on AKI incidence and three studies (n = 1596) on AKI progression. Elevated UACR was associated with an increased risk of AKI (pooled OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.79) and AKI progression (pooled OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.59-5.45). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AKI prediction were 0.71 (95% CI 0.59-0.80) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.76), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies, and UACR thresholds for AKI prediction varied widely. Despite these limitations, UACR appears to be a promising, low-cost biomarker for predicting AKI, particularly in high-risk settings such as cardiac surgery. Standardization of thresholds and further validation are needed to support its clinical implementation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Siriraj Hospital (TH), The University of Melbourne (AU), Mahidol University (TH), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Austin Hospital (AU), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (DE), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.