Dysphagia Therapy Following Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice and Preferences

Purpose: This study investigated the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing dysphagia therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving radiation therapy (RT). It explored current practices versus perceived optimal practice, therapy preferences, and factors influencing these preferences. Method: A total of 152 SLPs completed a 32-question survey. Response numbers varied per question due to the skip logic design. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results: Most SLPs provided one to three total sessions pre-RT (96%) and one session per week during RT (across 7 weeks), and they reported that 3.5 total sessions pre-RT ( SD = 4.3) and 6.9 total sessions across the RT period ( SD = 5.8) would be optimal. Post-RT, 24% reported providing more than 10 total sessions, while the perceived optimal number was 13 total sessions post-RT. The most frequently selected interventions were effortful swallow, tongue base retraction exercises, and proactive swallowing therapy, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation and thermal tactile stimulation were the least preferred. Factors influencing intervention choices included evidence supporting its use (98.6%), compatibility with SLP's skills (98.5%), and the patient's quality of life (97.2%). Less influence was attributed to caseload limitations (58.3%), financial-related factors, the need for preparation time prior to therapy sessions (38.9%), and the ability to deliver by teletherapy (33.3%). Conclusions: A mismatch remains between current practices and perceived optimal practice, particularly pre- and post-RT. SLPs applied various therapeutic interventions and programs. Participants prioritized evidence, patient quality of life, swallowing deficits, comorbidities, and their own skills and ability to implement a given therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_persp-25-00118
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dysphagia Therapy Following Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice and Preferences

Jeff Searl, Busra Ensar-Yilmaz
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Dysphagia Therapy Following Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice and Preferences

Jeff Searl, Busra Ensar-Yilmaz
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing dysphagia therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving radiation therapy (RT). It explored current practices versus perceived optimal practice, therapy preferences, and factors influencing these preferences. Method: A total of 152 SLPs completed a 32-question survey. Response numbers varied per question due to the skip logic design. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results: Most SLPs provided one to three total sessions pre-RT (96%) and one session per week during RT (across 7 weeks), and they reported that 3.5 total sessions pre-RT ( SD = 4.3) and 6.9 total sessions across the RT period ( SD = 5.8) would be optimal. Post-RT, 24% reported providing more than 10 total sessions, while the perceived optimal number was 13 total sessions post-RT. The most frequently selected interventions were effortful swallow, tongue base retraction exercises, and proactive swallowing therapy, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation and thermal tactile stimulation were the least preferred. Factors influencing intervention choices included evidence supporting its use (98.6%), compatibility with SLP's skills (98.5%), and the patient's quality of life (97.2%). Less influence was attributed to caseload limitations (58.3%), financial-related factors, the need for preparation time prior to therapy sessions (38.9%), and the ability to deliver by teletherapy (33.3%). Conclusions: A mismatch remains between current practices and perceived optimal practice, particularly pre- and post-RT. SLPs applied various therapeutic interventions and programs. Participants prioritized evidence, patient quality of life, swallowing deficits, comorbidities, and their own skills and ability to implement a given therapy.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Michigan State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dysphagia Therapy Following Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice and Preferences — Jeff Searl, Busra Ensar-Yilmaz · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS