What Program for Love in the 21st Century? Thinking With and Beyond Luhmann

ABSTRACT From a sociological perspective, the paper examines how normative frameworks for intimate relationships have changed since the publication of Luhmann's Love as Passion (1982). Building on Luhmann's notion of a program for love, we discuss his claim that late 20th century love semantics were organized around a program of understanding . We argue that understanding , requiring partners to incorporate the other's worldview and self‐image into the observation of their behaviour to infer ‘love’, has lately evolved into a program of acceptance . The latter provides solutions to problems stemming from societal evolution: the inclusion of individuals in a functionally differentiated society, the weakening of traditional frameworks stabilizing intimate expectations and the rising relevance of therapeutic semantics for intimate relationships. Drawing on sociological scholarship, advice literature and empirical data, we show that contemporary love semantics now centres on the question ‘what should I accept?’ and on the definition of the limits of acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70032
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Program for Love in the 21st Century? Thinking With and Beyond Luhmann

Martin Blais, Chiara Piazzesi
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

What Program for Love in the 21st Century? Thinking With and Beyond Luhmann

Martin Blais, Chiara Piazzesi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT From a sociological perspective, the paper examines how normative frameworks for intimate relationships have changed since the publication of Luhmann's Love as Passion (1982). Building on Luhmann's notion of a program for love, we discuss his claim that late 20th century love semantics were organized around a program of understanding . We argue that understanding , requiring partners to incorporate the other's worldview and self‐image into the observation of their behaviour to infer ‘love’, has lately evolved into a program of acceptance . The latter provides solutions to problems stemming from societal evolution: the inclusion of individuals in a functionally differentiated society, the weakening of traditional frameworks stabilizing intimate expectations and the rising relevance of therapeutic semantics for intimate relationships. Drawing on sociological scholarship, advice literature and empirical data, we show that contemporary love semantics now centres on the question ‘what should I accept?’ and on the definition of the limits of acceptance.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.