Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Discussions of the decolonization of quantitative methods have often been overlooked in recent debates. Using Chilisa’s integrative and adaptive methodological framework, we provide a critically reflexive account of the design process of an online multi-lingual survey that sought to unpack pluriversal understandings of democracy in South Africa. The article describes the process we developed to surface the latent assumptions of mainstream survey instruments measuring the understanding of democracy across Africa, and how we used this to inform the development of our own survey instrument. Reflecting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach, we also consider the role of translation as an epistemic exercise. In turn, this leads us to question the epistemic and cultural assumptions that are embedded in the Likert scale and how uncritical adaptation may undermine decolonial intentions. By sharing these insights, we hope to expand the discussion of the decolonization of quantitative methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/31314802
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Critical reflections on designing an online survey in a decolonial research project

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

Discussions of the decolonization of quantitative methods have often been overlooked in recent debates. Using Chilisa’s integrative and adaptive methodological framework, we provide a critically reflexive account of the design process of an online multi-lingual survey that sought to unpack pluriversal understandings of democracy in South Africa. The article describes the process we developed to surface the latent assumptions of mainstream survey instruments measuring the understanding of democracy across Africa, and how we used this to inform the development of our own survey instrument. Reflecting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach, we also consider the role of translation as an epistemic exercise. In turn, this leads us to question the epistemic and cultural assumptions that are embedded in the Likert scale and how uncritical adaptation may undermine decolonial intentions. By sharing these insights, we hope to expand the discussion of the decolonization of quantitative methods.

Human Science Research Council SA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.