Predictors of willingness to use an HIV vaccine among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, and transgender and non-binary persons: evaluating the role of vaccine confidence, altruistic motivations, social concerns, and conspiracy belie

Globally, LGBTQIAPN+ individuals experience significant health disparities and variable vaccine uptake, influenced by medical distrust, marginalization and discrimination. This study explored of willingness to use a hypothetical HIV vaccine among men who have sex with men, transgender and non-binary persons in Brazil. A cross-sectional, web-based survey recruited participants via dating applications and social media from July to December 2021. Beyond demographic and behavioral information, the following instruments were used: the Vaccine Confidence Index, Vaccine Conspiracy Belief scale, and two other scales that measured altruistic motivations and social concerns. Willingness was assessed with the question “Would you use a vaccine against HIV (to prevent HIV acquisition)?” and the 4-point Likert-type scale responses were dichotomized into “No” which included “extremely unlikely”, “unlikely”, and “likely”, and “Yes” which included “extremely likely”. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between factors and willingness to vaccinate. Out of 3337 participants (97.7% cisgender men, 97.1% reported sex with men), 2562 (76.8%) expressed willingness to use a hypothetical HIV vaccine. Final model results indicated that higher perceived risk of HIV (adjusted odds ratio per 1 standard deviation increase [aOR/1SD]:1.13, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]:1.02–1.26), perceived vaccine effectiveness (aOR/1SD:1.15, 95%CI:1.02–1.29), altruistic motivations (aOR/1SD:2.41, 95%CI:2.18–2.68), and social concerns (aOR/1SD:1.37, 95%CI:1.24–1.52) were independently associated with increased vaccine willingness. Conversely, stronger vaccine conspiracy belief (aOR/1SD:0.89, 95%CI:0.80–0.99) was associated with decreased willingness to vaccinate. These findings underscore the importance of addressing vaccine conspiracy beliefs and promoting altruistic motivations in public health strategies to enhance vaccine uptake.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine X
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2026.100796
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of willingness to use an HIV vaccine among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, and transgender and non-binary persons: evaluating the role of vaccine confidence, altruistic motivations, social concerns, and conspiracy belie

Thiago S. Torres, Silvana Pereira Giozza, Cristina Pimenta, Beatriz Grinsztejn et al.
Vaccine X
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Predictors of willingness to use an HIV vaccine among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, and transgender and non-binary persons: evaluating the role of vaccine confidence, altruistic motivations, social concerns, and conspiracy belie

Thiago S. Torres, Silvana Pereira Giozza, Cristina Pimenta, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Paula M. Luz, Amanda T. Amorim, Valdilea G. Veloso
article en

Abstract

Globally, LGBTQIAPN+ individuals experience significant health disparities and variable vaccine uptake, influenced by medical distrust, marginalization and discrimination. This study explored of willingness to use a hypothetical HIV vaccine among men who have sex with men, transgender and non-binary persons in Brazil. A cross-sectional, web-based survey recruited participants via dating applications and social media from July to December 2021. Beyond demographic and behavioral information, the following instruments were used: the Vaccine Confidence Index, Vaccine Conspiracy Belief scale, and two other scales that measured altruistic motivations and social concerns. Willingness was assessed with the question “Would you use a vaccine against HIV (to prevent HIV acquisition)?” and the 4-point Likert-type scale responses were dichotomized into “No” which included “extremely unlikely”, “unlikely”, and “likely”, and “Yes” which included “extremely likely”. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between factors and willingness to vaccinate. Out of 3337 participants (97.7% cisgender men, 97.1% reported sex with men), 2562 (76.8%) expressed willingness to use a hypothetical HIV vaccine. Final model results indicated that higher perceived risk of HIV (adjusted odds ratio per 1 standard deviation increase [aOR/1SD]:1.13, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]:1.02–1.26), perceived vaccine effectiveness (aOR/1SD:1.15, 95%CI:1.02–1.29), altruistic motivations (aOR/1SD:2.41, 95%CI:2.18–2.68), and social concerns (aOR/1SD:1.37, 95%CI:1.24–1.52) were independently associated with increased vaccine willingness. Conversely, stronger vaccine conspiracy belief (aOR/1SD:0.89, 95%CI:0.80–0.99) was associated with decreased willingness to vaccinate. These findings underscore the importance of addressing vaccine conspiracy beliefs and promoting altruistic motivations in public health strategies to enhance vaccine uptake.

Vaccine XVol. 30
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.